Applying The Two-Limbed Analysis

Improved Essays
The existing test for determining whether the freedom of political communication has been infringed requires the judges to apply the two-limbed analysis as set out in Lange. The first limb questions whether the relevant law effectively burdens communication about government and political matters. The first limb questions whether the relevant law effectively burdens communication about government and political matters. In Monis, the judges unanimously agreed that the content of the letters sent by the appellant were political in nature and this law subsequently burdened the freedom to political communication. The subject of controversy and disagreement lay within the question of the validity of the law.

The second limb derived from Lange

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jacobson arguing that the court had abused its discretionary powers when it did not allow Jacobson’s attorney’s to poll the jury, and instead assumed that the jurors had abided by the restrictions placed on them to avoid news reports. The due process clause guarantees everyone the right to a trial by an impartial jury, and this was denied to Sandra L. Jacobson when public broadcasting was clearly impartial towards the prosecution, and the jurors had the means to watch said report, which would render them biased. Legally, if there is the possibility that jurors may have been exposed to material that is prejudicial, then an appellate court should be able to gauge the exposure and determine the prejudice of the jury. The trial court was able to determine that unfair prejudice from this broadcasting station, including information that would be inadmissible in trial and would therefore contaminate the jury. Several cases have shown that warnings alone do not neutralize the potential for jury contamination, so a trial court should not rely solely on the warnings it gives jurors.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Name: Anthony Douglas Elonis, Petitioner, v. United States., No. 13-983 (2014) Factual History: Anthony Douglas Elonis actively uses Facebook, a social networking Web site. After seven years of marriage, Elonis’s wife left him and took their two young children with her. Elonis changed his user name on Facebook to a fake name. He posted a threating photo of one of his co-workers and himself on Halloween. After his co-worker’s found out about the photo, Elonis posted a status threating to kill multiple friends and co-workers.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jon Johansen, a resident of Norway, purchased a computer program for playing digital versatile discs (DVDs) and reverse-engineered the program to obtain the Content Scramble System (CSS) algorithm, however, the program that Johansen purchased was subject to a click-through license provision forbidding such activates. The license informed users that the program contained confidential trade secret and forbade reverse engineering of the program, however, Johansen, successfully obtained the CSS code and wrote a program called DeCSS that allowed individuals to decrypt the CSS source code that is embedded in the DVD thus allowing them to play and copy movies in an unencrypted format. October 1999, Johansen posted DeCSS on a website, that later appeared on a website maintained by Andrew Bunner. Two months after the initial posting of DeCSS on the website maintained by Bunner, the DVD Copy Control Association (DVD CCA) brought suit under the California Uniform Trade Secret Act against Bunner and others who allegedly published DeCSS or provided links to websites publishing DeCSS.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AOL Clause

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Case Activities 1 Spotlight on AOL The facts presented in this scenario state that AOL, LLC was a brought a suit filed by 650,000 members for making their personal information public. The members alleged that AOL was in violation of California law. AOL countered by asking for dismissal of the suit based on a “forum-selection” clause that designates the Virginia courts to try member disputes. There are two precedents exposed within this problem first is that The United States Supreme Court has held that a forum selection clause is unenforceable “if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought” and second is California has declared in other cases that the AOL clause contravenes a strong public policy.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2012 Dbq Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is significant because it explicitly reveals that the government is willing to go to great extents to enforce the enjoyment of these rights, as any small offense of this act can result in a court…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is known to have the freedom of speech under the Bill of Rights, however, certain speeches could be restricted. The court case Schenck v. United States has classified how the first amendment could be restricted from an individual if it causes a “clear and present danger”. The court ruled that Schenck’s words and expression are not protected under the first amendment as he attempted to disturb military efforts during wartime. The impact of Schenck v. United States was negatively substantial in the United States as it describes that free speech does not have unlimited authority when it comes to causing a clear and present danger to society. Furthermore, the case has negatively affected other court cases with similar aspects…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court cases have played a requisite role in modifying and defining certain amendments in the constitution. The decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans has displayed a monumental impact on American society, both at the time of the decision and in the latter future. Though the first amendment prohibits the restriction of speech and press, in this particular case the government was entitled to restrict those rights. The court argued that Texas specialty license plate designs constitute government speech, and thus Texas was entitled to refuse to issue plates featuring SCV’s proposed design. The court 's decision has stimulated great reaction in our nation causing dispute over whether the government passes off private speech as government speech.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a Democracy it is important to have frequent elections where all adults have the availability to participate. Until recent history the United States had mechanism put in place where some groups of society had multiple obstacles. Mechanisms like poll tax and literacy tests were given to reduce the number of minority voters. Individuals were even disfranchised and had no capability to vote. Devices and mechanisms able to break the burden of disfranchisement had first began in 1965 when a group of peaceful marchers traveled to Selma, Alabama, to the state capital of Montgomery to push and promote legislation for the creation of new voting rights legislation.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The primary argument and deciding factor in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2008) was that Citizens United’s First Amendment rights were violated. The Supreme Court is held accountable towards upholding the constitution and upon scrutiny of all relevant rulings, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). The procedure of the Supreme Court’s ruling was a series of addressing previous held court precedents, including the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United in…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Non-Compete Agreement

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Id. at 265-66. “If any of these questions is answered in the affirmative, the restriction in question is unreasonable and unenforceable.” Id. at 266. In this case, the third prong is irrelevant, since “the mere fact of some limitation is not sufficient to constitute injury to the public interest.” Id. at 267.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Field Case Analysis

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case a man named Abel Fields falsely said that he worked in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had earned a purple heart which you only earn if are wounded in battle. This man never served in the military so everything he said was false. He was making these claims in a public safety meeting, he told the public that they should listen to him because of his experience.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, although the right to express an opinion does give the public access to different opinions, which…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The matter is presently pending adjudication. In reviewing the law, the Court ought to bear in mind that the primary objective of Parliamentary Privilege is to strengthen the process of public debate by ensuring free speech on the floor of the House, which is critical in ensuring the organic growth of State Policy. Parliamentary Privilege permits discussion on all issues, some of which might even be considered anarchist or seditionist, when raised outside Parliament. However, even when seen from this viewpoint, it is apparent that providing privilege beyond the scope of speech would be to convert the liberty granted for some purposes into a licence for all purposes. More importantly, the immunity under Article 105 ought to protect ‘free speech’ and consequently, if the speech is tainted by favour or corrupt considerations, it deserves no protection.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays