Not only does the Wife of Bath introduce this act in a very nonchalant way, but she also says that he was not that bad because he only took the young maiden’s honor and did not impregnate her. Also, the character of the young maiden serves no other purpose besides being raped. After her character is raped by the Knight she is never mentioned again in the entire tale. Some might argue that the tale is feminist because in the next scene the Queen chooses to spare the Knight and the King does not decide his fate. This is not feminist because the Queen’s decision to spare the Knight was simply not very important to King. Whether or not the Knight lived did not really affect the King’s life. If the Queen had made the decision of whether or not to invade another country then it would be a feminist action, because it would have affected both her and the King, but her ruling over the Knight is not a true show of power over her husband and is not truly
Not only does the Wife of Bath introduce this act in a very nonchalant way, but she also says that he was not that bad because he only took the young maiden’s honor and did not impregnate her. Also, the character of the young maiden serves no other purpose besides being raped. After her character is raped by the Knight she is never mentioned again in the entire tale. Some might argue that the tale is feminist because in the next scene the Queen chooses to spare the Knight and the King does not decide his fate. This is not feminist because the Queen’s decision to spare the Knight was simply not very important to King. Whether or not the Knight lived did not really affect the King’s life. If the Queen had made the decision of whether or not to invade another country then it would be a feminist action, because it would have affected both her and the King, but her ruling over the Knight is not a true show of power over her husband and is not truly