Andrew Jackson Case Analysis

Improved Essays
With regards to the violation of states’ rights by Andrew Jackson, the unjust actions taken against the interests of the states verify that Andrew Jackson should be impeached. The responsibilities he held as president were not taken with the interests of states.
A paradigm of states’ rights not being present is the tariff placed on foreign goods. The protective tariff played a significant role in the American System. Southern port cities likes Charleston, South Carolina opposed the tariff due to a mass number of people in the area being planters and there was hardly any industry in the state, it was mostly an agricultural area. The planters exchanged goods such as cotton and sugar for the goods that Europeans had to offer in return, but many
…show more content…
American cotton was flooding the market, largely from the newer southwestern states, and the fertility of southeastern soil was declining. South Carolina was in an economic vice and needed in some way or form a catharsis. More harm was caused to states like South Carolina rather than helping them. The anti-tariff sentiment was not innocuous for the reasons that it did not benefit southern states. The rights of southern states were clearly being …show more content…
South Carolina held a special convention whose resolution made a radical reinterpretation of the Constitution. It declared that states would then be able to disregard a federal law such as the tariff law. If two thirds of the states voted against the law, the law would then the law would be rejected, but if less than two third of the states nullifies the law then the law would still be put into action. The states that were against the decision made would have to deal with new change or leave the union if they didn’t approve. The doctrine was an indication that the power of the federal government wasn’t supreme. Jackson was against nullification. The states then didn’t have the right to decide what was best for them in regards to federal laws being passed therefore the rights of states were not being preserved and all the power then laid in the hands of the federal government.
Also the Force Bill of 1833 authorized President Andrew Jackson to use the army and navy to collect duties on the tariffs of 81828 and 1832. In response to the nullification crisis, Congress had passed the Compromise Tariff of 1833 on the same day stating that the tariffs will be slower but if one don’t pay, they will be forced to pay the tariff. Therefore the Force Act was not involved because the Compromise Tariff covered the fact that military

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Commissioner of South Carolina, John Smith Preston, believes that “the South cannot exist without slavery…” (Page 72) which is why South Carolina was the first to succeed from the Union. Southerners did not want to put and end to slavery, therefore creating this uprising that influenced many factors such as states rights, the economy, and the state as a whole. With the many states succeeding in effort to dissolve the Union, politics played a big role between the North and the South. Dew realized that time and time again, in all the commissioners’ speeches and letters, slavery was always the main topic brought up along with other brief topics discussed in this book.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Vice President, John C. Calhoun wrote “South Carolina Exposition and Protest” a document that greatly provoke the Nullification Crisis and also led to the Southern secession. The Crisis began in 1832 when the series of protective tariffs, tariffs are taxes placed on goods imported from foreign countries that prepared a nation to raise money ( "1832 Nullification Crisis"). The Nullification Crisis began when Congress passed the Tariffs of 1828, which was the third protective tariffs and taxes increased to 50% and it was also designed to motivate Northern industry by collecting high import duties on cheaper British goods. While Northern states stoop profit richly from the tariffs, Southern states were not happy with the tariffs as…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such the national government had the short-term victory, but in the long run, the government did not take the big picture into account. Jackson’s quick and aggressive retaliation is what spilt America for years to come. Although a majority of the government believed that South Carolina should have been disciplined, there were a few outliers, like Clay and Calhoun, who showed that there was also mixed views from the “top.” There was still a minority that was against the hurried decision that Jackson made, which could have been the reason for such confusion. Regardless, if South Carolina threw up the “white flag” by repealing the nullification, the idea of nullification, in general, never died away.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our story starts when John C. Calhoun, our vice president, resigns because he does not like the tariff law. The tariff laws propose to encourage the Americans to buy Americans goods. The 1828 tariff was aimed at certain goods coming in from England. The goods were produced in New England. The Consumers in this case were people in the Southeast.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Tariff Dbq

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Here the States have no other agency than to direct the mode in which the votes shall be given.... The people, then, and not the States, are represented in the Executive branch....” (Jackson, 9). The people of the Union voted on who they want to represent the country and since that was Jackson, he believes that he has the…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the Southerners thought it only beneficial industrialized northern states, but shrunk the English demand for raw cotton from southern states and increased the price of goods to American people. Although Calhoun supported the tariff at first, he realized that it was being unfair to the South, his home state South Carolina as well. Therefore, his essay “South Carolina Exposition and Protest” was published. Calhoun believed in states’ rights, he claimed in his essay that states have right to veto federal law if it’s disadvantage to them and his idea of nullification. Also, he became the leader of South Carolina in opposing the tariff and Southerners believed that he is an intellectual political leader.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of the nullification came from John Calhoun, who believed that the federal tariffs were unconstitutional, in which made the people follow his belief’s as cotton growers within the South began to hurt financially due to the tariff tax, which reduced the British demand for the raw cotton in the US. When the convention took place within South Carolina and they were able to nullify the 1828 and 1832 Tariffs, Jackson requested from Congress, to past the “Force Bill” which would provide him with the authorization needed to obtain the US Army to make South Carolina become compliant with the federal law. As South Carolina was about to be under attack by the US Army, they were able to back down and accept the compromise presented. They accepted the compromise tariff that was put together by Henry Clay. The Force Bill ended up becoming nullified by the state convention and all of the worry was over, as both sides were satisfied with the…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believed that the people of a state or several states, acting in a democratically elected convention, had the retained power to veto any act of the federal government which violated the Constitution and explained that in The South Carolina Exposition and Protest, “If it be conceded, as it must be by every one who is the least conversant with our institutions, that the sovereign powers delegated are divided between the General and State Governments, and that the latter hold their portion by the same tenure as the former, it would seem impossible to deny to the States the right of deciding on the infractions of their powers, and the proper remedy to be applied for their correction. The right of judging, in such cases, is an essential attribute of sovereignty, of which the States cannot be divested without losing their sovereignty itself, and being…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    South Carolina was the only state to threaten secession over tariffs. President Jackson’s threat to use force in upholding the supremacy of national laws eliminated any further threats of secession (Stamp pg 156). Economic differences did not escalate into war due disputes over tariffs. Tensions rose due to Southern fears that slavery might be abolished. A New Orleans paper claimed the Southern Minority would have to accept some forms of economic oppression at the hands of the federal government like tariffs and the national bank.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The southerners were experiencing dramatically different developments than the northerners between the 1830s and 1860s. The crop of choice in the south became the cotton, and it was quickly labeled the king. Cotton contributed to half of the exports in the nation, and the Southern farmers knew that they would get rich if they continue to farm the cotton. Southerners brought slaves and slavery with them into the southwestern territories of the United States because for the farmer to grow cotton required slaves and land. The southerners did not care for the big cities, and they did not have jobs to offer which made it hard attract the immigrants the way the northerners do.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    South Carolina seceded from the Union on December 20, 1860. Residing in Fort Moultrie, located near the Charleston Harbor, United States Maj. Robert Anderson and his force of less than a hundred soldiers found themselves in hostile territory. Maj.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was the Civil War Unavoidable? The question that comes to people’s minds is…. Was the civil unavoidable or could it have been avoided in some way. The first attack in the civil war was when the confederates bombed Union at Fort Sumter in South Carolina.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Jackson, however, liked to call it “the principle of rotation in office” by allowing more citizens to participate and avoid becoming a bureaucracy. Unlike any previous president, Jackson vetoed 12 bills that he believed to be a matter of policy rather than just unconstitutional. Yet he had no intentions of extending federal authority at expense of the…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the antebellum period growing tensions between slave states and free states began to erupt. Efforts of the north to abolish slavery collided with efforts of southern slave holding states to expand slavery. Not only was the south’s economy heavily influenced by slavery, but also seen as a right stated in the constitution, the right to own property. These two notions will divide the Union and lead the southerners to try and secede from the north. Although it can be argued otherwise, slavery was the main cause leading to one of the bloodiest wars in American history.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The north’s rocky geography and harsh winters with short growing season didn’t allow for profitable farms like it did in the South. Instead, the North became an industrialized region, where steam powered factories produced textiles that used the souths raw cotton. The problem with the differing economies rested on the fact that the south felt that they were being unfairly taxed. Taxation had been granted to the United States federal government through the United States Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the US constitution states that ““The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises”.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays