His particular friend proposes the idea of a “feeling, which Freud comes to learn as an “oceanic feeling” that is not an “article of faith” but yet manages to drive all religions” (36). However, Freud is not convinced that this “oceanic feeling” as the driving force for the development of religion among humans: “From my own experience I could not convince myself of the primary nature of such a feeling. But this gives me no right to deny that it does in fact occur in other people. The only question is whether it is being correctly interpreted and whether it out to be regarded as the fons et origo of the whole need for religion” (37). Through his analysis and beliefs, Freud concluded religion is an illusion on a massive scale as one of multiple means of the ego coping with suffering and avoidance of what he considers as “unpleasure”. The ego, part of the
His particular friend proposes the idea of a “feeling, which Freud comes to learn as an “oceanic feeling” that is not an “article of faith” but yet manages to drive all religions” (36). However, Freud is not convinced that this “oceanic feeling” as the driving force for the development of religion among humans: “From my own experience I could not convince myself of the primary nature of such a feeling. But this gives me no right to deny that it does in fact occur in other people. The only question is whether it is being correctly interpreted and whether it out to be regarded as the fons et origo of the whole need for religion” (37). Through his analysis and beliefs, Freud concluded religion is an illusion on a massive scale as one of multiple means of the ego coping with suffering and avoidance of what he considers as “unpleasure”. The ego, part of the