David Hume is a philosopher who wrote essay Of Miracles. He has clearly pointed out about miracles on his essay Of Miracles. In his essay, he defines a miracle that “miracles were violations of laws of nature, and therefore could only be performed by God or those God had entrusted with divine powers” (Craig, 28). In one word, he denied for the existence of miracles. In his theory, miracles have been brought about by God and/or invisible power, which related to God against rules of nature; hence, he was skeptical about miracles.
The reason why he wrote this essay is because it is seen in a book that “Hume wanted to root out had its basis in religious belief” (Craig, 24). He wanted to change people in his country especially about their religious thoughts so that he has tried to convince people in his essay. …show more content…
In his theory, testimonial evidence from eye wittiness is not enough to trust. In the book, it is written that “going on their own experience and using their own reason, could work out for themselves” (Craig, 27). People are often convinced something by their past experiences; therefore, testimony might be coming from their own prediction or to be obsessed with an idea from their past experiences. Especially, when miracle, such as unusual event or supernatural has happened, people are likely to convince themselves what they have seen and/or experienced. These people might have strong testimonial evidences; however, it also might be created as evidences by witnesses because of their mistakes. Sometimes what those witnesses have said is inconsistent or even sometimes contradictory. Thus, he theorized that testimonial evidences are not trustworthy to prove the existence of
The reason why he wrote this essay is because it is seen in a book that “Hume wanted to root out had its basis in religious belief” (Craig, 24). He wanted to change people in his country especially about their religious thoughts so that he has tried to convince people in his essay. …show more content…
In his theory, testimonial evidence from eye wittiness is not enough to trust. In the book, it is written that “going on their own experience and using their own reason, could work out for themselves” (Craig, 27). People are often convinced something by their past experiences; therefore, testimony might be coming from their own prediction or to be obsessed with an idea from their past experiences. Especially, when miracle, such as unusual event or supernatural has happened, people are likely to convince themselves what they have seen and/or experienced. These people might have strong testimonial evidences; however, it also might be created as evidences by witnesses because of their mistakes. Sometimes what those witnesses have said is inconsistent or even sometimes contradictory. Thus, he theorized that testimonial evidences are not trustworthy to prove the existence of