Buchenau explains that president Obregón was shot by a, “fanatical Catholic.” While most historians have accepted this theory, there are other popular theories regarding the Obregón’s death. While it could have been easy to ignore other theories, Buchenau presents one. He says that it was believed that Obregón was assassinated by Morones, Obregón’s labor secretary. He then claims that there are no documents that verify the theory. Since historians largely agree that Morones was innocent of the crime, it is fair for Buchenau to say that there is no proof of Morones’ guilt. By presenting the theory, Buchenau provides a wider view of history. Even though he later disproved the theory, the reader gets multiple points of view on the event and a clear explanation for why the theory is wrong. Thus Buchenau presented the event objectively and fairly for the reader to be properly
Buchenau explains that president Obregón was shot by a, “fanatical Catholic.” While most historians have accepted this theory, there are other popular theories regarding the Obregón’s death. While it could have been easy to ignore other theories, Buchenau presents one. He says that it was believed that Obregón was assassinated by Morones, Obregón’s labor secretary. He then claims that there are no documents that verify the theory. Since historians largely agree that Morones was innocent of the crime, it is fair for Buchenau to say that there is no proof of Morones’ guilt. By presenting the theory, Buchenau provides a wider view of history. Even though he later disproved the theory, the reader gets multiple points of view on the event and a clear explanation for why the theory is wrong. Thus Buchenau presented the event objectively and fairly for the reader to be properly