In preparation for the destruction of Earth, humans are to be transported to continue life on the planet Mars. Scientists have been studying this planet for decades. Research and experimentation have shown Mars is capable of supporting human life forms and other organisms. However, the time and money necessary to accomplish such a feat would be astronomical. Matt Williams, the Guide to Space Curator for Universe Today, expresses his opinions on this phenomena in his article, “How Can We Live on Mars?” As a science fiction author, he discusses the advantages of mass migration and the obstacles encountered in doing so. Williams does not explicitly state the mission can be accomplished, but he does provide his plan of attack. I agree with Williams
…show more content…
Second, in the event of a global catastrophe due to climate change, Mars would serve as the backup location. Additionally, potential resources like “water, precious metals, or additional croplands” are within grasp. Williams touches upon the goals of Elon Musk, a SpaceX coordinator. Musk would like to establish a Martian colony of 80,000 people; Williams respects the idea because of the cheap real estate, but is no fan of the commute. Above the drive of exploration, Williams is sure the difficulty of the task is the main reason for the entire operation. He discusses the difficulties and obstacles, too. Mars suits the title “cold vacuum of space” because of the extreme cold and lack of oxygen. Plus, radiation is constantly streaming. Williams views a problem arising concerning spare parts and medical supplies. It is obvious that continually shipping materials from Earth would be expensive. Another issue confronts the effects of low gravity on the human body. Williams states, “If we intend to live on Mars, and stay there permanently, we’ll be leaning pretty hard on our technology to keep us alive, never mind making us …show more content…
William displays the reasons to go and those not to go. The article explains the escalation of pride as a result of accomplishing this feat. In addition, the article clearly defines the dangers faced and investment required. After reading this article, I oppose the migration of humanity to Mars. I believe if our race is taunting death, death will declare victory no matter what. Therefore, I do not see the logic in wasting time, money, and possible lives in hopes of a new
Second, in the event of a global catastrophe due to climate change, Mars would serve as the backup location. Additionally, potential resources like “water, precious metals, or additional croplands” are within grasp. Williams touches upon the goals of Elon Musk, a SpaceX coordinator. Musk would like to establish a Martian colony of 80,000 people; Williams respects the idea because of the cheap real estate, but is no fan of the commute. Above the drive of exploration, Williams is sure the difficulty of the task is the main reason for the entire operation. He discusses the difficulties and obstacles, too. Mars suits the title “cold vacuum of space” because of the extreme cold and lack of oxygen. Plus, radiation is constantly streaming. Williams views a problem arising concerning spare parts and medical supplies. It is obvious that continually shipping materials from Earth would be expensive. Another issue confronts the effects of low gravity on the human body. Williams states, “If we intend to live on Mars, and stay there permanently, we’ll be leaning pretty hard on our technology to keep us alive, never mind making us …show more content…
William displays the reasons to go and those not to go. The article explains the escalation of pride as a result of accomplishing this feat. In addition, the article clearly defines the dangers faced and investment required. After reading this article, I oppose the migration of humanity to Mars. I believe if our race is taunting death, death will declare victory no matter what. Therefore, I do not see the logic in wasting time, money, and possible lives in hopes of a new