Analysis Of Lifeboat Ethics Garrett Hardin

Great Essays
In “Lifeboat Ethics: The case against helping the poor” by Garrett Hardin, the author points out many reasons for his main argument that rich nations should stop giving foreign aid to the poor nations that are in need. The well-developed nations, including the United States of America and other European countries are known for the aid they offer whenever a country is in need. However, Hardin claims that giving a foreign aid to other countries in need will be detrimental to the rich nations’ economies. He explains his claim using the “Lifeboat Metaphor” in which the rich nations represent the people on the boat. The poor, in contrast, are represented by the swimmers trying to climb on the boat. Hardin believes that taking in additional 10 people …show more content…
It is not accurate to say that the third world countries are always dependent on the rich nations. To say that “it is time to refuse to give aid in the form of food to needy countries that do not accept responsibility for limiting their population growth (Hardin 204)’’, is definitely unethical an contradicting as well to what he has studied while he was in school. One thing that very much makes his reader question his stance of aid is his ethics and humanitarian perspective. He explains in many occasions throughout the text that programs such as “food for peace program” (Hardin 205), will only do harm than benefit the countries eventually. Because of the failure of the food for peace program, Hardin assumes that the newly developed program called the World Food Bank, will also fail because of human greed and it will do no good but harm those who are in need. From an ethical perspective, even if it the Food for Peace program were to fail, the program should at least be tried. Hardin is very skeptical when it comes to foreign aid and he encourages the rich nations to stop helping those in need and basically this in his perspective teach them a lesson to control their population and get themselves out of the situation they are in. He claims that foreign aid is only going to hurt these nations and they have …show more content…
In the Christian Paradox by McKibben, he pointed out that “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (McKibben 272). Poverty is a cyclical and one of the cause is unexpected natural disasters. Nothing could be expected and so, like McKibben says, it is up to the rich to help those in need and the rich nations should help those in need because when and if one of the rich nations are stricken with some unexpected natural disaster and causes a damage to the people and the economy, then these rich nations would need and expect the other nations to help out with whatever they can. The poor nations are not poor because they wanted to but because they didn’t have the choice. Also most of the third world countries are poor because they were robbed off their resources by these rich nations. Hardin is very much unethical to say not to help others because it would cause the rich nations to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the introduction, the author appeals to sympathy using strong and emotionally charged phrases. Saying that “the most effective ways to address hunger in poor countries have fallen out of fashion,” the author makes his readers feel anger toward the Western countries and their indifference to the issues of hunger and poverty in developing countries and in the same time share empathy toward undernourished people of Africa and other starving regions in the world. Throughout the article, the author evokes negative and criticizing emotions toward all the Western world. In the phrase “What’s so tragic about this is that we know from experience how to fix the problem,” (Paarlberg) he emphasizes that we know how to fix the problem but we are two selfish to do something for…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is important because if the United States would change the way they give aid, then the problem of starvation would be able to be solved much easier. If the U.S. and other countries wanted to help Africa they would purchase African goods to help those starving. The U.S. is benefitting as much, if not more than Africa is, by sending their own food over to Africa. If the U.S. purchased African goods then that would help African farmers to be able to earn money off of their crops so that they will be able to feed themselves. The U.S. sending food makes Africa dependent on the U.S.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics, he emphasizes on the ethical issue of how to judiciously help the poor and the argument behind it. In the beginning of the essay Hardin responds to the comparison of Earth as a spaceship, by stating that it can be dangerous when used by misguided idealists to justify suicidal policies for sharing our resources through uncontrolled immigration and foreign aid. Interestingly enough, he prefers to address the issue with a lifeboat metaphor, in which refers to the rich nations (such as the United States) as being aboard the boat, as well as the poor nations who are swimming around the boats for…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why Is Peter Singer Wrong

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, believes that when we refuse to help end world hunger, we become murders. He believes that it is are moral obligation as Americans who live comfortable lives, to help “the worlds poor” (Singer 1). It is wrong to continue to live a luxurious life, when we know that others are fighting for the mere chance to survive. In Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” he compares us Americans to two fictitious characters Dora and Bob, due to the fact that we, as Dora and Bob, chose luxuries over the chance to help people suffering from life-threatening poverty. Peter Singer compares us to a fictitious character from a Brazilian film called “Central Stations.”…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: In the final chapter of Come Hell or High Water:Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster Michael Dyson looks at how different groups use religion in the face of a natural disaster. In Hurricane Katrina there were essentially two groups that were a part of the disaster: poor, black victims and those that were supposed to help them. For those that are in a position to help, they often view natural disasters as a means for God to punish sinners and for those that need help they look to God as a comfort and as a way to cope. In the chapter, Dyson discusses how several Christian role models made similar statements about how New Orleans is a hub of sin and that the citizens of New Orleans snarl in the face of God until they need help;…

    • 1072 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Peter Singer Famine

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To Hardin, it is nationhood and the concept of overpopulation that should dictate an individual’s role in helping the poor. He believes those that live far away on other continents, or within other states, should not receive help from those in wealthy nations like the United States. American citizens, according to Hardin, have no obligation to help those that are starving in other countries, even as a result of a failing government. He believes that any foreign aid given to states will only lead to worse outcomes for the rest of the world. If countries provide foreign aid, “poor countries will not learn to mend their ways, and will suffer progressively great emergencies as their population grows.”…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hunger in almost all nations, including the Unites States of America, is caused by poverty or a host of things that interact with poverty. These causes can be, but are not limited to discrimination, lack of power, corruption of government officials, war, environmental overload, and scarcity of resources. Unfortunately for most of the world, discrimination still exists and can cause biases when handing out food aid. In America’s case, lack of power and corruption of government officials are not a problem anymore, but environmental overload and scarce resources are still problems today (Hauptmann, Cole). As Americans, building houses on farmland for our expanding population and using more water than necessary.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defense of the survivors’ guilt arising from not helping the poor, he claimed that “the net result of conscience-stricken people giving up their unjustly held seats is the elimination of that sort of conscience from the lifeboat”. He defined guilty about one’s good luck as a type of conscience and the newcomer’s lack of guilt about the rich people’s loss as conscience drain; but the author deliberately omitted the morality of rich people’s indifference to the poor asking for help. Counting the negative effects on total conscience in the lifeboat if no rescue is attempted, the final solution to the lifeboat dilemma might be changed. Essentially, the author’s negligence of social injustice against impoverished people and the ethical issue indifference is just a result of his bias for the rich countries.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. In other words, it is the study of what is wrong and right, good or bad. Humanity has been intrigued with the answer to these subject matters for hundreds of years. In that time there have been several philosophers such as Aristotle who have formulated moral theories like Virtue ethics. Not all of these theories are put in practice today but they do help in the solving of moral issues.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sachs Vs Easterly

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    These two authors approach overseas aid in two different ways. Sachs takes the top-bottom approach, while Easterly takes on the bottom-top. The top-down approach is to plan a goal on what is already existing, for instance Sachs mentions the Millennium project. This project is to achieve a certain set of goals by a time for individuals in developing countries. It’s aim is to extinguish extreme poverty, achieve education and equality, sanitation, and to overall, not only improve, but to ensure the stability of the people's health/life.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suppose there was a boat with only ten available spots left, the answer for all three suggestions Hardin suggested is simple. First, allow the extra ten people on board, of course with the most sensible selection of those ten. Then let the others know that you will come back for them, meaning you will try to do your best to think of a solution to help the poor. Next, look for others who would be willing to help get the others out of the water. For example, the wealthy should contribute with shelter, clothing and food for the poor.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays