American Imperialism In The Philippines

Improved Essays
Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence by utilizing diplomacy or military force. At the turn of the 19th century imperialism was not a proper and legitimate policy for the United States to follow because it was militarily, politically, and socially problematic.

Imperialism created military problems because the invasion of other countries did not help the United States maintain a good image. President McKinley stated that “we could not give them back to Spain” (Doc3). “The Spanish American war took place because of America’s strong expansionist sentiment.” Because of America’s expansion it created social tensions between Spain and America. McKinley stated “there was nothing left for us to do but take them all” (Doc3). In the 1900’s the boxer rebellion occurred in which Chinese citizens protested the open door policy. Because of America’s expansion, many rebellions and wars came from it. America’s determined mindset drove them forward to acquire more influence in foreign areas.

Imperialism caused many political problems. Henry Cabot Lodge stated that the Philippines “have never known liberty” (Doc6). Politicians thought that some territories would be an easy gain but yellow journalists hyped up the
…show more content…
280,000 people died from America taking control of the Philippines. Henry Cabot Lodge stated that America was “in the Philippines righteously as we are there rightly and legally. Americas Imperialism had an aspect of enslavement by taking advantage of another country for its own interests. Albert Beveridge, a Republican senator, stated “We will not abandon our opportunity in the orient”. Henry Cabot Lodge stated that the taking of Philippines does not violate the principle of the declaration”. Invading the Philippines should not be thought of in a positive aspect let alone an opportunity. America violated the rights of The Philippines which created social

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Equally important was the rationale of easier trade and business opportunities in Asia because of the annexation. Once again, it is unrighteous to own people in order to do business with them. All in all, the United States as a major power did not have the right to exploit the Philippines through the excuses of Christianity, business opportunities, and protecting takeover by other countries. The United States in fact used it for their own benefit, mostly to increase their naval…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They decided to Annex the Philippines but it was not popular with some of the people and they were very unhappy about this decision. I believe the United States should have annexed the Philippines to have their own independence, have protection, and have an education. The Philippines should have annexed for various of reasons.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Filipino insurgent has been fighting for their independence against Spain for several years, “the decisions of the united states to annex the Philippines was not popular” (Document C). Aguinaldo and his men now turned their guns on the Americans. It was an unfit for self-government Filipino want to fight for their…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Spanish-American War, the United States had possession of the Philippines. This created a divide in the United States about whether to keep the Philippines for its commercial value or to allow the Philippines to become independent. The purpose of the document, The Taste of Empire by Albert J. Beveridge, is to write a disquisition on how essential it is for America to monopolize the Philippines and continue to preserve it. He addresses to the audience of labourers and farmers to show the benefits those groups would enjoy, such as; better wages, and higher prices for produce.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America Dbq Analysis

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If the United States did not annex the Philippines, one of our rivals could easily take the country. President William McKinley knew that “we could not turn them over to France and Germany- our commercial rivals in the Orient- that would be bad for business and discreditable” (Document C). Losing the Philippines would be feeding money to our enemies. America is doing what is best for the Philippines by teaching them a new and formulated way of functioning. “There was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them” (Document C).…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ Philippines Dbq

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States annexed the Philippines on February 7th, 1899. The Philippines didn’t want that though. It was wrong that the United States had annexed the Philippines because, first of all, the Filipinos were fighting for their independence, second of all, was for religious reasons, and last but not least, self-government. The Filipinos have been fighting for their independence from Spain for several years.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Imperialism

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    William Mckinley said “that there was nothing left for us to do but take them all and educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and christianize them” (Document A 1899 Methodist delegation).There was no need to take control of the Philippines because they already had a government set in place. It would have been more appropriate to keep in close contact and monitor the Philippines until it was determined that they were capable of protecting themselves from foreign invaders. The U.S. forced the Philippines to fight back just as Great Britain had forced the U.S. to fight for their…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American Imperialism Dbq

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In a speech in early 1899, when debate was raging over what the United States should do with the Philippines, Congressman George Hoar made the argument that the constitution does not give the United States the right to rule people in order to “civilize them,” and doing this against that people’s own interests went against the text and the spirit of the document, and the founding principles of the United States. Hoar also argued against the claim that holding on to the Philippines was for the Filipinos’ benefit: The people there have got a government, with courts and judges, better than those of the people of Cuba, who, it was said, had a right to self-government, collecting their customs; and it is proposed to turn your guns on them, and say, “We think that our notion of government is better than the notion you have got…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States had a long tradition of expansion across the continent, but by the late 1800s, people started urging the U.S to start expanding overseas, following European’s model of imperialism. America’s actions in Cuba and the Philippines were the first steps in its quest to build an overseas empire. Many people say that for a complete explanation of U.S. actions in the 1890s, one would have to give equal weight to four motives: racism, nationalism, commercialism, and humanitarianism. However, humanitarianism was not a major cause of U.S’s actions in Cuba and the Philippines. The goal for the U.S was not to help people’s lives in those countries, but rather for commercialist, nationalist and racist reasons.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Advantages Of Overseas Expansion

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Some argued the moral position of this situation. They thought it was wrong to subjugate other nations for America’s welfare; and they were willing to apply the human rights to the people in the foreign lands. Others criticized the act of hypocrisy America was in. The United States knew what it was to fight for the liberation of its people, but still it wanted to do the same thing to less-develop countries. The anti-expansionists saw the contradiction of America’s actions.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After imperialism After the Philippines became part of the U.S. there were positive and negative effects caused by imperialism. Positive- Public education established Roads and railroads were built Hospitals were built The U.S. helped the Filipinos when the Japanese occupied the Philippines The U.S. eventually helped the Philippines become an independent nation Negative- The Philippines revolted against American rule The Philippine-American War Over 1 million had died as a result of this war Left without a strong leader Struggled economically…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America should become anti-imperialists and not annex the Philippines. This is because the Spanish-American War has just concluded. Americans must decide whether to emerge from the war as an imperialist power or as an anti-imperialist power. According to pages 626-628 of American Nation, for three months, America has fought alongside the Philippines for their independence against the Spanish. This was was caused by harsh ruling of the Spanish colonies.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As shown in Document F, it talks about how the conquest of the Philippines was only to expand the Eastern commerce and it was to develop the imperialized countries. The policy was appropriate for the U.S. because it let us achieve this, since the imperialism policy we were able to pull the Philippines out of an abusive relation with Spain and develop the Eastern commerce to improve the U.S. dominance and the Philippines connection to the world, and its economy. Document F states “interest of the highest and best kind, impose upon us the retention of the Philippines, the development of the islands, and the expansion of the Eastern commerce.” This document shows the indeed the imperialism was for the Eastern commerce and the development of both countries and it also improves that imperialism was an appropriate policy at the turn of the 20th…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Americans started to expand its territory, they didn't look after Native Americans and ignored them. A decade later, with the "criminal aggression" in the Philippines, racism was reflected in new expansion. The American Anti-Imperialist League asserted that the blood of the Filipinos was on American hands, and Americans resented the betrayal (Doc D). Josiah Strong, a prominent Congregationalist minister from Ohio, thought that America needed to claim as many of the unoccupied lands of the world, as it could, in order to further the Anglo-Saxon race (Doc B). At this time, president Roosevelt employed the foreign policy using his new naval Power.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism is not a good policy for the United States as it discredited our reputation as an advocate for democracy. In Mark Twain 's essay ‘To the Person Sitting in the Darkness’ he talks about how our actions in Cuba were “honorable and righteous.” But yet our actions in the Philippines had affected our reputation as a proponent for democracy. The United States actions in Cuba were honorable as we were advocating for democracy we wanted to help the unstable country prosper, while as the United States actions in the Philippines were not honorable as it was barbaric, savage-like and brutal. What is going unsaid in this essay by Mark Twain is why are we going against our ideals, are we not proponents for democracy?…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays