There was no interaction effect observed between structural priming and regions on reading time, F1 (2, 22) = 0.63, ns, η2p = .054; F2 (2, 48) = 1.57, ns, η2p = .061. Reading times were not significantly different at the target word between relevant and irrelevant structural primes, t (24) = 1.62, ns. Reading times were not significantly different at the word immediately after the ambiguous word, t (24) = 0.34, ns. Reading times were not significantly different at the second word following the ambiguous word, t (24) = 0.96, ns.
Discussion The current research aimed to understand how ambiguity is processed and whether it can be influenced by what is read before it. Mean accuracy was shown to be 86% which indicated that participants were reading
Discussion The current research aimed to understand how ambiguity is processed and whether it can be influenced by what is read before it. Mean accuracy was shown to be 86% which indicated that participants were reading