Agamemnon In The Iliad Character Analysis

Improved Essays
In Book 9 of the Iliad by Homer, the reader witnesses an interesting event. Prior to this book, Agamemnon, the greatest of the Achean Kings, has hurt Achilles’ pride by taking Achilles prize, a woman. Because of this assault on his honor, Achilles has sworn that he will not fight for the Greeks, which has left the Greeks without their most potent weapon. Agamemnon eventually realizes that he was wrong and sends an embassy to Achilles consisting of: Odysseus, the great tactician, Pheonix, an old mentor of Achilles, and Ajax, the most respected of Achilles’ comrades in arms. The reader can learn about each of the ambassadors based on what the ambassadors say to Achilles and how they say it, but we can also learn about Achilles by his response. …show more content…
Achilles begins by asserting that he must say what he feels, not what he thinks. Achilles rails against Agamemnon saying “I hate that man like the very Gates of Death (9:378).” Achilles goes on to complain about all of the work he has done and how Agamemnon, who would not participate in raids, would keep most of the loot. Not only does Agamemnon keep most of the treasure, he thinks he can take another man’s prize. If Agamemnon can take a prize once, what is to keep Atrides from doing it again? Achilles says “Now that he’s torn my honor from my hands, [. . .] don’t let him try me now. [. . . ] He’ll never win me over (9:217-219)!” He goes on to claim that he is going to sail the next day and he advises the others to do the same. Achilles goes on to say that he will not accept any gifts from Agamemnon. Not even if it were all of the wealth of Egyptian Thebes. He ends by extending an invitation to Pheonix to sail with him in the morning, if Pheonix so choses. We see in Achilles’ response to Odysseus that Achilles has many feelings on the subject of Agamemnon, and none of them flattering. Achilles says in line 463 that he “wouldn’t give you a splinter for the man (9:463)!” Achilles obviously no longer trusts Atrides and will not allow himself to be duped by Agamemnon …show more content…
Instead of ____ lines, Pheonix’s speech is ______ lines. Pheonix also takes a narrative approach to appeal to Achilles’ emotions. He begins by telling the story of how he ran away from home and came to Peleus’ kingdom. Pheonix appeals to Achilles’ loyalty by talking about all of the things that Pheonix did for Achilles and that he did these things that “”someday you [Achilles] might fight disaster off my back (pg. 268).” Pheonix continues talking about how the gods are changeable, implying that man should follow the example of gods, and how heroes should be adaptable. He follows these assertions with the story of Meleager. Meleager did almost exactly what Achilles is doing, he got angry and decided not to fight for his city. This cost Meleager status and honor. Pheonix concludes by pleading for Achilles to join the fight. He also appeals to Achilles’ lust for honor by saying that if Achilles fights, “the Acheans will honor [him] like a god (pg.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One of the most interesting scenes in Book Nineteen of The Iliad is that which takes place between the two characters Agamemnon and Achilles. This scene, which takes place from approximately from lines 100 through 140, involves the resolution of the anger between these characters which was the result of their dispute over Briseis in Book One. This passage is important to the story, as Achilles is able to put aside his anger towards Agamemnon and return to the fighting, due to his desire to revenge Patroclus, as well as it demonstrates Agamemnon’s inability to surrender his pride. This is because Agamemnon blames his action of the stealing Achilles’ war-prize Briseis on Zeus and Fate rather than admitting his fault, which would only sully his pride. Therefore, this scene demonstrates Agamemnon’s lack of responsibility, concerning his…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What kind of example does Achilles set for his fellow soldiers? How can they respect a man whose foolish actions took their friend’s lives? Surely some portion of the army will emulate Achilles, causing bickering and insubordination. Overall, the way Achilles responds to anger denotes a petulant and unappealing…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rage In The Iliad Analysis

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Homer’s The Iliad, rage is a driving force for the mortal characters, unlike the stoic, unemotional nature of the gods. Each human character seems to have his own vendetta, and will go to great lengths to get the justice he feels he deserves. The enraged state these characters reside in only heightens the conflicts they experience in the war, pushing the story along further. Achilles and Agamemnon are prime examples of this, pushing forth their agendas due to their rage-filled emotional states, and this directly juxtaposes the unemotional nature of Zeus, the highest of all Greek gods.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Role Of Honor In The Iliad

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Homer uses Achilles’ discussion with Patroclus in The Iliad to ridicule fighting for honor; by equating Achilles’ grudge against Agamemnon with the larger purpose of the Trojan War, Homer casts war, glory, and honor in a light that both exposes their vacuity and proves their uselessness. Homer parallels the Achaeans’ conflict against the Trojans to win back Helen to Achilles’ struggle with Agamemnon over Briseis to argue that the reasons for war often do not justify the act itself. The Iliad opens by simultaneously presenting the contention between Agamemnon and Achilles alongside the slow conclusion of the Trojan War, drawing clear parallels between the two clashes. Just as…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Theme Of Revenge In Iliad

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Here is a man who wishes to be above all others, who wishes to hold power over all” (Homer, 286-289) Achilles understands that and he is a single one who could resist the Agamemnon’s will. The king understands that there would not be anyone who could make Achilles afraid of the king, as he is the strongest soldier and he could not be killed. Therefore, Agamemnon hates Achilles but he also understands that he would not win without him. In order to show the respect to Achilles, the gives him gifts.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The quoted passage from Book Twenty-one of The Iliad is an excerpt of Achilles’ speech in rejection to Trojan prince Lykaon’s plea for life when he has finally resumed in the war. In this passage, Achilles contrasts the former and present way in which he treats the Trojans and states the reason of his change. By doing a close-reading of this passage, I hope to address the major shift in Achilles’ outlook on fate and death that is reflected in his change of attitude towards the Trojans. The first six lines really stand out in illustrating the significance of Patroklos’ death for it marks both Achilles’ return to battle and the change in his treatment of the enemies from “it was the way of my heart’s choice to be sparing of the Trojans”…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    You will eat your heart out, raging with remote for this dishonour done by you to the rarest of Achaeans (A 289-295) In this speech, it shows how much Achilles values honour and the amount of hatred he had towards Agamemnon who dishonoured him. This was caused due to Agamemnon who took Briseis, his symbol of pride. Because his symbol of pride was taken away, Achilles grew in rage and did not participate in the war. Overall, personal honour and excellence plays a main role in the warrior’s motivations, like Hector who fights to fulfill his duty and to fight for his family.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From the very beginning of Homer's the Iliad, Achilles is depicted as vindictive, prideful, and trifling. As the book advances, the picture of Achilles as a resentful youngster is improved significantly. Towards the end of the epic, Achilles displays qualities that are viewed as courageous even in today's time. When his reliable and trusted companion Patroclus passes on, Achilles experiences an extreme change in character. When he goes up against the genuine repulsiveness of death, Achilles sets aside his juvenile approaches to satisfy his obligation to his companion, his countrymen, and his inner voice.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Achilles takes his pride too far when he refuses to be affected by the suffering of his comrades. Achilles swears that “[Agamemnon] will never win him over”(Fagles 263). He is too engulfed…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patroclus treated Achilles with great respect because he recognized how great of a warrior and how godlike Achilles is. With this still in mind, Patroclus knew that Achilles was being full of himself and something had to be done. In turn, he volunteered to pose as Achilles and fight to push the Trojans back. Achilles let Patroclus join the fight not out of love for his fellow Achaean, but for his own self gain. An example of this occurs in book 16 where Achilles says “Win me my honor, my glory and my honor from all the greeks, and, as their restitution, the girl Briseis, and many other gifts”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Homer’s epics have left an undisputable and profound influence on Western literature. However, outside of the realm of literature, Homer’s ideas about honor, kingship, and leadership continued to affect the political world hundreds of years after his death. Specifically, Homer’s impact on Alexander the Great played a central role in not only the way Alexander saw himself, but also in the way he established and ruled the largest empire on earth. From an early age, Alexander was exposed to The Iliad and The Odyssey under the instruction of his teacher, Aristotle. The parallels between Alexander and Achilles are striking; for instance, both are undoubtedly the most remarkable warriors.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans looks upon heroes, and heroes represent his people ideology. Epics have introduced a numerous amount of characters, but only a few are considered heroes. Gilgamesh from “Epic of Gilgamesh” stands out as one. Gilgamesh carries a perfect body gifted by the gods, as he is two-third god and one-third man. He is also the king of Uruk, a shepherd to his people.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Book 1 of the Iliad, Achilles and Agamemnon appear to be fighting over who should surrender their war spoils for the good of the Achaean war effort. King Agamemnon is frustrated that he was told to give up his kidnapped woman rather than Achilles, the greater warrior. Homer casts Achilles in the light of the besieging hero and Agamemnon as the greedy king who cares more for wealth and honor than his men’s lives. As the book progresses and insults traded, Homer switches sides as Achilles removes himself from the battle. Homer reveals his true support not for the character, but the greater good of the Achaean war effort.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Such an affront to his person could not possibly be ignored and he would be not satisfied with just a simply fight but one to the death; Achilles’ prideful anger was only stayed by the gods. His thoughts immediately fly toward killing Agamemnon,…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the entirety of the Iliad, we see Achilles transform into a character with which we can empathize. Throughout the Iliad, Achilles is known as the fiercest warrior in all of Greece by every character, including the Greek king, Agamemnon. He is described by Homer as “swift footed” and “god like” on numerous occasions in order to emphasize his physical abilities. He was most likely an extraordinarily agile and strong fighter able to easily outmaneuver or overpower any opposition on the battlefield.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays