Advantages And Disadvantages Of Legal System

Improved Essays
Law is the set of rules and principles that helps to guide the society in balancing everything. It commands what should be done and what should not be done. It helps in protecting the rights of a person and property. People should beware of the rules and their rights to stay safe.
There are 3 legal systems: adversarial, inquisitorial and jury system.
Adversarial legal system (common law): The judgements of the past cases will be used for cases with similar facts if there is any dispute or confusion about the law. The judges have a right to make laws and the laws made by the higher courts should be followed by the lower court. In this system, two advocates represent their clients and argues for justice and the jury gives justice. It is the party’s responsibility to gathering the evidence and present it in front of jury. In this system the judges does not examine the case, the evidence of an individual party is collected during the investigation and is presented in front of the jury. Lawyers from both the side produce their arguments and argue them in front of the judge who is not partial. Lawyers of both the sides can question the opposition witnesses. The defendant of the case has a right to choose trail by jury.
…show more content…
The parties are given access through the legal system where every individual party has a right to control their case with equality. Disadvantages- finding the truth in a case and giving the right judgement is less because the parties of the case provides evidence which supports their point of view The parties incur more costs because the cases goes on for years and skilled layers charge

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The individuals falsely accused in the article may have been victims of the Assembly-Line Justice Court Model. It is discussed that this type of court is unfair with little concern for efficiency or processes. This model also suggests that plea bargains are frequent because parties wish to make a quick decision. Milton Lantigua was offered a plea bargain but denied it because of his innocence. He was then sentenced to 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democratic societies like Canada and the United States follow the unwritten and underlying principle of “rule of law”. The rule of law ensure that a certain level of procedural justice are achieved in trials, as they provide the court with a basic grid of evaluation. However, such procedural processes were not respected in the Bryant-Milam trial, as the the two social categories of race and social class tarnished the processes of the trial, fostering impartial judicial proceedings and ultimately disallowing justice. The trials ability in achieving justice was deterred as occupational status and race contaminated and fostered impartiality amongst the jury, the witnesses and the provided evidence; three of the fundamental components of a judicial proceedings.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Winthrop's Speech to the General Court seems almost insignificant at first glance. The governor appears merely to be celebrating his victory in court by preaching a small speech about politics. Yet it is also the earliest document we have in American Heritage: A Reader that does not mention the King of England by name, aside from the sentence-long Salem Covenant. Indeed, the ideas in the Speech to the General Court pose a singular threat to Britain's rule in the colonies because of their adherence to the declaration principles of rule of law, civil liberty, and the consent of the governed. Rule of law is the principle that both the rulers and the people of a state are subject to the same rules.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Legal 2) Attitudinal 3) Strategic With the vague words of the constitution and these 3 models this is how the Supreme Court justices are to make decisions. 1) The legal aspect of the decision-making is strictly based on the facts, laws & precedent.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The legal system in America still allows for racial exclusivity and discrimination on members of minority groups. The plea bargaining process is used in the legal system to help resolve criminal cases and supports the basic structure of the legal system but does not support the due process rights of criminal defendants. Plea Negotiations Support the Structure of the Legal System The adversary system is the legal system in which prosecution and defense are opponents, or adversaries, and present cases. The goal in an adversarial system is not to determine the truth but to win. The majority of criminal cases are resolved through plea bargaining- a guilty plea by the defendant in exchange for recommendations of a lesser punishment or reducing the original charge.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Morton Court Case

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout the years people have claimed and argued their position towards a big question. Although the simple truth thesis states that big questions admit simple, obvious, and undisputable answers this is not true. Big questions never admit straightforward and unquestionable answers. A big question can be anything from What is Life? to Is capital punishment wrong?…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror Case

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    succo / Pixabay The American legal system has long depended upon the lowly juror to effectuate justice within its system. The juror is the fact-finder in most civil criminal matters in a court of law in the United States. The juror decides which set of presented facts represents the best truth, and how to mete out justice based on those findings.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juries The jury system has been a part of our society for hundreds of years. It was first created to give all defendants that option to be judged by their peers for their charges instead of by solely a judge. This provides an excellent opportunity to those who feel that their peers can give them a verdict that is not decided by the professional judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Their answer was to establish multiple new courts at different levels of jurisdiction; including trial, appellate, and supreme court levels. They assigned particular duties and responsibilities to each level of court, from regulating ordinances and city laws to handling minor disputes like property and divorce. One especially important model that was adapted for use in state courts was the New York State Field Code of 1848. This code clarified jurisdictional claims of different issues and gave specifics in the matter of court procedures and regulations. It also established a set of simplified rules for pleadings and how they were to be brought before the court in different situations.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that laws are something that were created to help people. Most of the help is figuring out who is right, how to handle something, or rules to follow (Behl, 2016). Hardly anyone would argue that this is a bad thing, until the law itself breaks the rules. Many laws can, in fact, contradict themselves. An example of this is the juvenile justice system and being able to wave the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The court system has a big role in the political process because they evaluate the issues that are brought to them and view them as terms of the legislation and the constitution. Furthermore, the court system is one of the largest in the nation with an estimate of at least two thousand judicial officers and employees. The court has at three levels which are superior courts, court of appeal and supreme court, they all have their own duties to uphold. Superior courts are the ones that take care of misdemeanors such as traffic offenses, felonies and civil suits. As well as this they can operate claim courts where people can bring in cases with damage claims up to a certain amount.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laws sets a barrier to which we can make decisions on our own and pushes us to our own boundaries. In particular this relates to me because there was this moment in my life where a law limited my decision making. I wanted to make the decision to drink alcohol to have…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays