Adam Smith Vs Marxist Analysis

Great Essays
Classical sociologists such as, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Max Weber describe economic interests as one of the motivations for social action. Adam Smith argues that economic interest is the only purpose for social action and through this societies prosper. Marx and Engels on the other hand believe that social action driven by economic interest is imposed onto society by institutions. Finally, Weber argues that history’s contingent development has caused an era where economic interest is the driving force for human social actions. The founding father of economics, Adam Smith, argues that humans innately partake in activities that will increase their personal wealth and this action is facilitated through free markets. In his work, The …show more content…
Marx explains that eventually the working class will revolt against their oppressors, and commence a revolution leading to a new stage in history. Marx calls this new stage Communism, a historic epoch where society will live prosperously with one another. Unfortunately, this epoch has not happened, instead society continues living through an economic perspective. For example, during the early 20th century Fordism, a term coined for Ford Motor Company’s combination of mass manufacturing and mass consumption, promoted social actions driven by economic interest in American society. Just like division of labor, Fordism created greater wealth, yet unlike it’s counterpart Fordism did not produce inequalities among classes. Under Fordism people had enough money for their daily expenses and reinvest their savings back into the economy in order of obtaining luxuries because the wealth that was produced as a society was equally payed back to the workers. Fordism is a perfect example of how a society can be driven through sole economic interest if the wealth being produced is shared evenly among

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is often said that significant change requires big thoughts, ideas, and suggestions. In the late seventeenth and eighteenth century, there was a period of many of these substantial changes. A group of men and women intellectuals called philosophes were hopeful in discovering new ways to understand and improve society, investing a variety of areas from science to religion. Many believed that if they paid close attention to nature and their surroundings, this could highly benefit society and could be applied to activities such as government and economics. Another belief was that reason was a great way to discover the truth, which is also why the Enlightenment period was called the age of reason.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Adam Smith believed that capitalism was the best thing for a country’s economy. He realized that by everyone specializing in one thing and selling a product for selfish reasons, society would benefit because everyone would have their needs. He believed in an ‘invisible hand’ that guided the marketplace and ensured that everyone benefited from…

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith was an economist from the mid-late 1700’s and he was able to explain the knowledge of Capitalism; elaborating on how to make money from the free markets that was influential to survival at that time. He wrote a book, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which describes the origins of Capitalism in great details with petty examples of this logic set in motion. On the other side of the spectrum, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both produce a collaborative piece called The Communist Manifesto which heavily criticizes the bourgeoisie, and pushes for a lifestyle in which all property is government owned; eliminating the class system and having all people of the nation work for the same salary. There is a stark…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While Adam Smith battled that the best financial framework is private enterprise, Karl Marx suspected something. Adam Smith additionally restricted the possibility of upset to reestablish equity for the masses since he esteemed request and solidness over alleviation from persecution. Marx firmly clung to the possibility that free enterprise prompts to ravenousness and disparity. Intrinsic to the possibility of rivalry is insatiability, opined Karl Marx, which would bring about inborn flimsiness and treachery in a general public. Socialism offered the best model – both political and financial – with its collectivist possession, creation and focal arranging highlights proposed to circulate riches fairly and dispense with the qualifications between…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx In the most recent election, an actual socialist ran. This raised many questions and Bernie Sanders has fooled millions of people into thinking about the viability of a socialistic government in the United States. Derrick Wilburn in his article, “Is capitalism really better than socialism or communism?” makes a case for American capitalism and attempts to convince those on the fence that socialism and communism are “the height of human arrogance.” Wilburn argues in his article that despite people’s best intentions, socialism and communism is a set up for an era of governmental rule and the slow diminishment of individual freedoms.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Things have changed and definitely for the better. The Enlightenment' or 'Age of Reason' was an intellectual movement in thinking in 17th and 18th centuries,which moved society's thinking from religious thinking to rational thought. Rational and scientific thought had led to an improved society and human beings' way of life, The philosophes believed in common that human freedom was necessary to improve a society. John Locke, the English philosophe, strongly believed that individual freedom was an important foundation of good government.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Wealth of Nations (WN) was a pioneering book exploring economic ideas which contradicted those that were in place at the time it was written. Many of the theories outlined are still relevant today. Adam Smith published the WN in 1776, by this time he already had gained a reputation as a notable writer following the publication of The Theory of Moral Sentiments in 1759. The plan of the work is logically structured and provides good summaries of the main themes which follow. The first four paragraphs introduce the reader to the main themes which are subsequently developed.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Vs Marx Essay

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Though the ideas of Smith and Marx are often seen as polar opposites, many similarities can be found in the basis of their respective theories. Adam Smith believed that the value of any good or commodity was best measured in labor. “If among a nation of hunters, for example, it usually costs twice the labour to kill a beaver which it does to kill a deer, one beaver should naturally exchange for or be worth two deer” (SMITH, 41). Smith continues by noting that it is natural for a good or commodity that requires double the labor of another to produce to be worth double the price of that commodity. Smithe refers to this labor cost as the natural value, or real value of a good.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx And Adam Smith

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thomas Robert Malthus, Adam Smith and Karl Marx each address the influence of production and prices on the human population and well-being. Specifically, in relation to food, they had different expectations of the markets and growth in response to the industrial revolution. Malthus focuses on a big picture notion of food versus people, and how the human population will fight through scarcity. Smith concentrates on prosperity and its relation to the human population and productivity. Marx, similar to Smith, argues from a smaller picture and highlights how rural migration will affect populations and that welfare is deemed by those with power.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION According to Karl Marx, (1818-1883) capitalists make and enforce laws that serve their interests and act against the interest of workers; their control over all institution enables them to create common beliefs that make workers accept their status. These economic, political and religious ideologies make the masses loyal to the very institution that is the source of their exploitation. Max Weber(1864-1920) on the other hand attempted to clarify, criticize and modify the works of Marx.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Adam Smith saw productivity the determinant of wealth and rational self-interest was the motivating force that would provide society a means of escape from scarcity. He believed success would happen when society harnessed the power of self-interest. 3. Today I left my house and I was making good timing…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Industrialization in the nineteenth century brought about many changes to the US economy and new perspectives among employers and their workers. The divide between the social classes became more prominent with the growth of big businesses and monopolies. William Graham Sumner’s A Defense of Laissez-Faire contained ideas many corporate leaders supported. Sumner explained that the government should not help the poor otherwise it would cause a decline in social progress. In addition to the Laissez-faire policy, Sumner also touched on social Darwinism.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The pre-industrial era was one of new lands, new wealth, and new ideas. It was a time where growth seemed not only sustainable, but rather necessary and admirable. That being the case, many an author sought to understand this new growth, to make it applicable to the their fellow citizenry, to guide the thoughts of those around them in the way they saw best fit for the benefit of society. Through these various thought experiments, our authors came to manifest seemingly radical notions of wealth and self-governance. Two of those who sought to tackle such topics were the prodigal Adam Smith and the lesser-known Bernard Mandeville.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Defense Of Self Interest And Selfishness When individuals see the term selfishness, they may frown upon seeing such a remark. Some individuals may claim that selfishness is associated with evil behavior. The viewpoint of someone who is selfish is a person who victimizes anyone. People who work to benefit themselves may further be classified as a felon or a sociopath. This explanation is invalid because those who serve in their own self-interest may not be evil people.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays