After the league studied the case of the Aaland islands, one of the members suggested that a rapporteur (a person appointed by an organization) should investigate the case thoroughly and suggest solutions after the investigation is done. Based on the rapporteur’s report, the council made a solution on June 1921, which identified the sovereignty of Finland over the Aaland islands but recommended that the language, culture and traditions should remain Swedish. The League of Nations also demilitarized the island so further there wouldn’t be any conflict/war. This solution of the league was accepted by both the countries in the end. So, this was a success to the league of nations. This way the league resolved the dispute between the 2 countries and made peace between …show more content…
The success for anything is determined by the process and the league have gone through the process of making peace between both the nations. This shows how successful the league was they followed the process, were alert, kept caution on every step, respected both the nations and also took safety measures. We can at last say that the league was a success in solving the Aaland island crisis and we can also say that the mission was a perfect and fantastic success after all the fails that took place before this