John Paul II Encyclical Fides Et Ratio

Improved Essays
Pope John Paul II’s encyclical Fides et Ratio is a comprehensive pamphlet on the relationship between faith and reason. In short John Paul II affirmes that theological faith and philosophical reason confirm one another. He states the “Church considers philosophy an indispensible help for a deeper understanding of faith and for communicating the truth of the Gospel to those who do not yet know it.” The idea that faith and reason confirm one anther is supported biblically. Reasoning about nature is found in The Book of Wisdom when it reads: “For from the greatness and the beauty of created things their original author, by analogy, is seen.” The Bible is stating that nature points to God. We may investigate nature and science to know God. …show more content…
One finds this interesting considering the history of the Galileo Affair. However, John Paul II quotes him saying “’[Galileo] declared explicitly that the two truths, of faith and of science, can never contradict each other, 'Sacred Scripture and the natural world proceeding equally from the divine Word, the first as dictated by the Holy Spirit, the second as a very faithful executor of the commands of God', as he wrote in his letter to Father Benedetto Castelli on 21 December 1613.” This is coming from a man who was sentenced to life in prison for standing what he believed to be truth. As John Paul II writes, man is morally obligated to adhere to the truth once it is discovered. Now the Vatican adopts similar language saying: “Methodical research, in all realms of knowledge, if it respects... moral norms, will never be genuinely opposed to faith: the reality of the world and of faith have their origin in the same God.” Galileo sensed in his scientific research the presence of the Creator who, stirring in the depths of his spirit, stimulated him, anticipating and assisting his intuitions”: John Paul II, Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (10 November 1979): Insegnamenti, II, 2

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    And this is what I have come to accept as well. I don’t think God wants us to take the science of the Bible literally, and I don’t think that God wants us to ignore the scientific evidence that we see around…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay One Throughout the course of human history science and its’ discoveries have been constantly changing and advancing, you could even say it has been evolving. From the Ancient Greeks to modern day science and the understanding of nature it provides has grown as views have changed over time. One of the most significant changes is how scientific views changed between 1600 and 1871. Scientific views changed between 1600 and 1871 as they started to become less influenced by religion, scientists having different views and methods, and the impact of exploration on science.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a Catholic institution, theology acts as a department for finding truths within human comprehension; these truths are found based on God’s “self-revelation [and] ‘understanding’ what God has revealed” as opposed to just Scripture since not all of the ancient texts are universally accepted and had to go through intense examination if they are (Cavadini…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through this entire endeavor, the author reaches into another of his main conclusions, that “genuine faith means to “live in the active voice” in the conversation with God” (pg. 19). Hill’s main concern seems to be the diagnostics of all faith aspects and the orientations of its attributes which he states “start to point to how we might teach faith in schools” (pg. 20). While analyzing the etymology…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the Treatise of Zera Yacob, reason and faith do not conflict. As a matter of fact, reason and faith are supportive of one another in that his faith in God has allowed him to delve deeper into the idea of God and the arguments for and against the type of God he is and if there even is a God. He believed that God allowed him to reason and to learn more about his own beliefs and the thoughts of people around the world. His perspective is a rare one in that it is commonly believed that reason leads to a lack of faith and eventually a form of atheism. The pursuit of scientific knowledge normally leads to a lack of faith due to a newfound belief in the tangible and a loss of belief in the intangible.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Showing that his goals to persuade others with science seemed small compared to the Bible. In all honestly, Galileo was a man with knowledge and wit, but it is common to be a man with multiple fallacies. Ironically, these fallacies within Galileo, are…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Galileo was arguing was, if the faculties of the senses are G-d given, so is the need for reason, which in this case would be science, more specifically his scientific claims. By choosing not to question and reason all that was presented as the truth, one was choosing not to follow one of the actual Scriptural truths. Furthermore, this claim opposed what Aristotle proved to be the truth (the Church’s convention), and “therefore mistrusting their defense so long as they confine themselves to the field of philosophy, these men have resolved to fabricate a shield for their fallacies out of the mantle of pretended religion and the authority of the Bible.” Even though his teachings were not accepted by the general public, there were a few religious figures that backed up his statements.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Galileo Wrong

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Galileo states: For let no one believe that reading the lofty concepts written in that book [the Bible] leads to nothing further than the mere seeing of the splendor of the sun and the stars and their rising and setting, which is as far as the eyes of brutes and of the vulgar…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Clifford Rationalism

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The philosophical evaluation of faith and reason seems to suggest a marrying of both sources which provides justification for his or her religious beliefs. Instead faith and reason many times results in strife and division as if these sources meant to bring about an understanding and knowledge regarding religious beliefs are incompatible. No different are the philosophy’s of William Clifford and William James regarding their stance toward the basis of religious beliefs and the means by which justification of beliefs are supported. Although Clifford maintains a strict adherence to a dogma stance of sufficient proof in relation to religious beliefs or no belief at all, and conversely James maintains there is a will and a right to believe when…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abelard Vs Aquinas

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The primary purpose of scholasticism was to “reconcile faith and reason” by applying ones basic theological, logical and philosophical knowledge. Two men, Peter Abelard and Thomas Aquinas, were very influential in regard to scholasticism during the High Middle Ages. There was and I think there still is, this ever growing dispute between nature and reality. An argument between faith, truth, and reason. Gaining knowledge and understanding faith is different than gaining the knowledge of a mathematical formula to solve an equation.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Every aspect of life was viewed through a lens of Christianity. Ancient writings held a position of power over people's everyday lives, and people looked to the church and government for direction in almost all things. Whether Christianity had a positive or negative effect on medieval times and people can be disputed, but its control, dominance, and how it was blindly accepted cannot go ignored. Christianity's influence and power started to decrease, however, during the Enlightenment, when many critical thinkers tried to be as rational as possible; they only believed what they perceived as reasonable or what they could explain using logic. Enlightenment thinkers looked at both their religious and economic beliefs through a lens of reason, causing…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The quote shows that reason is more important than belief. Without reason, humans would never have the prospect of faith and belief. Throughout the novel Life Of Pi, Yann Martel shows how Pi uses reasons to survive on the lifeboat for 227 days. Pi, the only human survivor, has to survive with Richard Parker, a tiger, using his knowledge and belief. Although Pi uses both reason (logic) and belief, it is reason (logic) that…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The presence of a sort of tension between faith and reason has been innate to humans since people first started to question what the true purpose of life is. The existence of this separation could be clearly viewed by looking comparing Athens and Jerusalem, with Athens representing truth through reason and philosophy and Jerusalem representing truth through insights of revelation and purity of soul. Therefore, faith and reason have always posed tension by their proximity and their constantly juxtaposing views. Many view these two concepts as complete opposites, that reason is proven by fact and that faith cannot be proven. However, some philosophers have described how faith and reason can actually come together to come to the truth and how faith can be an extension of the reason that works to reach a higher truth.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, they find it hard to believe that faith and reason are connected as one. In Pope John Paul II encyclical we see with various supporting ideas how faith and reason are both needed to live the Gospel, and how various philosophers have influenced this statement. In the following three chapters, we have come to terms and gained a better understanding of both faith and reason as separates and faith and reason together. Subsequently this encyclical helps us reflect on faith and reason in a deeper level to perceive the truth about philosophy and faith. The purpose of Fides et Ratio is for us Catholics to understand this to become closer to the Gospel in a spiritual level and he also wants to explain and defend the view that they both have equally necessary and complementary roles in coming to the truth.…

    • 2610 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays