I will be writing about some 911 conspiracy theories that explained what really happened on that day, some theories will be convincing but others won’t.
I want to start off with how the buildings were not destroyed by the fire. Multiple
Chemists and physicists have said that it would be impossible for two planes to bring
Down one of the best structurally engineered building in the world. There is lot of
Things to back this up. First, there is the jet fuel witch the media and the US
Government Sayed that fire which was ighted by jet fuel brought down tower 1 and
2. But jet fuel only burns at 1500o which to melt steel it would need to burn at 2750o
Seems a bit suspicions. In addition experts say that the steel frames didn’t have …show more content…
To back this up theory up there have
Been multiple witnesses saying they herd explosions just before the tower fell. But
People that engineered the building say it was the steel floors collapsing on each
Other and that’s how it made a noise like an explosion. However 1000 of people still
Don’t believe the engineer and I don’t believe him to but since the engineer “proved
The explosive theory” wrong there has been a thermite theory. My third argument for,
The theory suggests that thermite was used on the towers structural beams to help it
Collapse hence why it fell straight down and not to the side. This is a very strong
Theory. Still there is no evidence to back this theory up and no one could even
Analyse the derby of the towers because the government sent the structural beams
To be melted hmmm seems suspicious to me and 1000’s of people around the world think the same.
Now I am going to start my argument against some theories, first I will start off with
This theory that suggests the planes where 3d holograms so they were fake firstly I
Am going to prove this theory wrong. Many witnesses of the attacks where asked
I want to start off with how the buildings were not destroyed by the fire. Multiple
Chemists and physicists have said that it would be impossible for two planes to bring
Down one of the best structurally engineered building in the world. There is lot of
Things to back this up. First, there is the jet fuel witch the media and the US
Government Sayed that fire which was ighted by jet fuel brought down tower 1 and
2. But jet fuel only burns at 1500o which to melt steel it would need to burn at 2750o
Seems a bit suspicions. In addition experts say that the steel frames didn’t have …show more content…
To back this up theory up there have
Been multiple witnesses saying they herd explosions just before the tower fell. But
People that engineered the building say it was the steel floors collapsing on each
Other and that’s how it made a noise like an explosion. However 1000 of people still
Don’t believe the engineer and I don’t believe him to but since the engineer “proved
The explosive theory” wrong there has been a thermite theory. My third argument for,
The theory suggests that thermite was used on the towers structural beams to help it
Collapse hence why it fell straight down and not to the side. This is a very strong
Theory. Still there is no evidence to back this theory up and no one could even
Analyse the derby of the towers because the government sent the structural beams
To be melted hmmm seems suspicious to me and 1000’s of people around the world think the same.
Now I am going to start my argument against some theories, first I will start off with
This theory that suggests the planes where 3d holograms so they were fake firstly I
Am going to prove this theory wrong. Many witnesses of the attacks where asked