AC 2.2 EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.
SUBJECT LEADER MANAGER
Focus Leading people Managing work
Have Followers Subordinates
Seeks Vision Objectives power Personal charisma Formal authority
Styles Transformational Transactional
Leadership
Leadership is setting a vision for a group or organisation and guide them in that direction. Organisational leader does not have subordinates, leadership is also similar to management. A leader cannot command people to follow them, they need to be inspire by their followers.
Transformational leadership increase the motivation and job performance of followers through different processes this includes getting the followers to have an interest in the organisation. A leader …show more content…
Mr. Worthy makes all the decision on his own and give the grow order about what he requires of them to do.
Advantages of Mr. Worthy using the autocratic leadership.
Autocratic leadership can be useful in situation where decision need to make quickly and without involvement of the group members. An autocratic leader is a very strong professional highly skilled leader who is able to take charge of an organisation that is falling due to poor leadership a strong leader can turn things around quickly by setting goal and objective and step to take to accomplish them.
Disadvantage of Mr. Worthy using the autocratic leadership.
While autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times, there are many situation where the leadership style can be complicated. If the leader abuse the autocratic leadership position people will then view them as bossy and dislike them causing hard feeling among the group.
The idea that group members can share their creative ideas in the decision making process will cause the members to dislike that …show more content…
Hogan using the laissez- Faire Leadership
If group members are well motivated and have the skill and ability to cope on their own members who are professionally skilled can be trust to work on their own initiative since they are well skill in all area of their job they will be able to complete task without much guidance.
Disadvantage of Ms. Hogan using the laissez – faire leadership
If group members are lack the knowledge and skill to perform the job they will not be able to complete the task given and they are not liable to make good decision and solve problem on their own. Deadlines will be missed, project will be left incomplete because they are in need of a leader to direct them. In this situation Ms. Hogan needed a more hand – on approach within the organisation.
AC2.4 How do you think the people under Ms. Hogan can be motivated? Explain how can Ms. Hogan motivate the staff to achieve the
SUBJECT LEADER MANAGER
Focus Leading people Managing work
Have Followers Subordinates
Seeks Vision Objectives power Personal charisma Formal authority
Styles Transformational Transactional
Leadership
Leadership is setting a vision for a group or organisation and guide them in that direction. Organisational leader does not have subordinates, leadership is also similar to management. A leader cannot command people to follow them, they need to be inspire by their followers.
Transformational leadership increase the motivation and job performance of followers through different processes this includes getting the followers to have an interest in the organisation. A leader …show more content…
Mr. Worthy makes all the decision on his own and give the grow order about what he requires of them to do.
Advantages of Mr. Worthy using the autocratic leadership.
Autocratic leadership can be useful in situation where decision need to make quickly and without involvement of the group members. An autocratic leader is a very strong professional highly skilled leader who is able to take charge of an organisation that is falling due to poor leadership a strong leader can turn things around quickly by setting goal and objective and step to take to accomplish them.
Disadvantage of Mr. Worthy using the autocratic leadership.
While autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times, there are many situation where the leadership style can be complicated. If the leader abuse the autocratic leadership position people will then view them as bossy and dislike them causing hard feeling among the group.
The idea that group members can share their creative ideas in the decision making process will cause the members to dislike that …show more content…
Hogan using the laissez- Faire Leadership
If group members are well motivated and have the skill and ability to cope on their own members who are professionally skilled can be trust to work on their own initiative since they are well skill in all area of their job they will be able to complete task without much guidance.
Disadvantage of Ms. Hogan using the laissez – faire leadership
If group members are lack the knowledge and skill to perform the job they will not be able to complete the task given and they are not liable to make good decision and solve problem on their own. Deadlines will be missed, project will be left incomplete because they are in need of a leader to direct them. In this situation Ms. Hogan needed a more hand – on approach within the organisation.
AC2.4 How do you think the people under Ms. Hogan can be motivated? Explain how can Ms. Hogan motivate the staff to achieve the