10 Reasons Why Gay Marriage Analysis

Improved Essays
The Student Action outreach of the Tradition Family Property (TFP) program published the article, "10 Reasons Why Homosexual "Marriage" is Harmful and Must Be Opposed." This article outlines 10 reasons as to why gay marriage should not be legal. For example, it states that same-sex marriage offends God, does not create families, will force schools to teach children to accept it, and deprives children of same-sex marriages of either a mother or a father. The writers state that they are practicing Catholics and they do not have any personal hatred against any individual. It continues to say that the intent of the article is to defend traditional marriage. The author argues that the main purpose of a marriage is to have children. However, that isn't entirely true. Both straight and gay couples want to be married for the same reasons, for example, making the relationship official gives it more substance. Having a legal marriage document and a formal ceremony with friends and family gives the relationship more meaning than just living together long-term. Marriages also give couples a sense of security that they will stay together through tough times. Once the couple is married they act and feel like a team. Heterosexuals and homosexuals both want the same things out of marriage. The article states, "Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law. Natural law's most elementary precept is that good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided." (TFP Student Action) Saying that to be a homosexual is against natural law in this way is strictly an opinion. The definition of evil can be different for many people. The author suggests that man knows what is morally right and wrong. However, one person's morals can be completely different than another person's. This isn't a valid argument because the writer doesn't back up their reasoning as to why same sex marriage is morally bad or against natural law. The author continues and states that children of same-sex marriages are denied to either a mother or a father figure and that it is in a child's best interest to be raised under the influence of its natural father and mother. …show more content…
They continue on by saying that this is proven by looking at psychological effects that being raised by a single parent has on children. However, psychologist Michael Lamb's research concluded that "the children and adolescents of same-sex parents are as emotionally healthy, and as educationally and socially successful, as children and adolescents raised by heterosexual parents." (Nicholas Jackson) Children of same-sex marriages are not deprived of a parent, this would mean that they only have one parent. Studies show that having two happily married parents is a child's best interest. Validating and "promoting" the homosexual lifestyle is talked about as if it is a bad thing. Validating that love is the most important thing shouldn't be viewed as a negative thing. The author states that same-sex marriage will devalue traditional marriage, however, they do not explain exactly how it would do that. Traditional marriage will still exist in the same way that it has. Traditional marriage is defined as one man and one woman being married by the word of God. What about all the people who aren't Christian and are in a common-law marriage? Are they a threat to traditional marriage? Each individual in a traditional marriage has the same standing in society as they always have regardless of the marriage law. The article states that you cannot call a same-sex union a marriage based on the fact that if the spouses want a child they would have to adopt or use a surrogate. In saying this, they also insinuate that straight couples that cannot have a baby due to the woman being infertile or the man being sterile cannot be classified as a marriage either. The seventh reason that the author believes same-sex says, "One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Traditionally, marriage has been referred to as a union between a man and a woman. In marriage, it is a “commitment of both partners before God to love, honor, and cherish each other – in sickness and in health, for richer or poorer” (Miller 177). In recent years, gay marriage has become an epidemic in societal news whether it is acceptable by God or not. There have been many opponents against gay marriage all with “Scripture as the foundation of their…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author claims that marriage is human nature and that it is a bond between couples and intended to bring children into the picture. Charles Colson in his article Societal Suicide: Legalizing Gay Marriage Will Lead to More Family Breakdown and…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first essay was “What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?” by Katha Pollitt. Katha Pollitt was for Gay marriage. Pollitt thinks her idea is write because she uses logical things. For instance she says that there still is “ forced marriages, child marriages, marriages predicated on the subjugation of women- gay marriage is like a fairy-tale romance compared with most chapters of the history of wedlock,(Pollitt 460). Pollitt basically says how it is ridiculous how we let these types of marriages…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Five Non-religious Arguments for Marriage over Living Together,” Dennis Prager states that there are vast differences between marriages and living in relationship and there are some points that he talks about, no matter what people things when they living together, but it changes when a person marry someone. Also, words and legality are matters for importance and responsibilities in a person 's life. In addition, marriage is important in many peoples’ life because only with marriage person can make a family; in the article Prager told that, men argue, life has no reason to marry “It’s only a piece of paper,” intend to this comment Prager says that person isn’t planning for forever to the committee or the person…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin, in the journal, Ann E. Kasak informs psychological professionals about supporting same sex marriage because overall the attraction is the same. Same sex marriage has been tested to be a morally right decision due to the brains formation. Kasak concludes, “Sessions will feature the latest scientific research into same-sex couples’ relationships and family formation among lesbian, gay and bisexual people, as well as the effect of sexual stigma on individuals and families.” Scientific studies have shown that the choice to be attracted to the same sex is just the same as “normal” attraction. Attraction comes in many different variations.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Political intersectionality is a form of structural intersectionality that addresses sexism, racism, class exploitation or homophobia in policy-making processes and policies. It indicates how inequalities and their intersections are relevant to political strategies.” Oftentimes the LGBT struggle for human rights is observed independently from the struggle of race, gender, disability, religion, and class. “Beyond Same-Sex Marriage” addresses political intersectionality and queerness by directing our attentions to the fact that people from all these groups exist within the LGBT community as well. There are a number of people with intersectional identities who are forced to endure distinctive patterns of tyranny, discrimination and exclusion.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage Equality and Voices for the Impotent. Andrew Sullivan is a prolific and provocative gay writer born and raised in England. In his eye opening article “Why Gay Marriage Is Good for Straight America”, Sullivan contradicts the legal and religious stance on gay marriage expressing that being gay is not necessarily about being an outsider rather it was about being American. Through reading Sullivan’s piece, it is evident that he had a very painful childhood when he realized he could never be who he truly is, love whomever he wanted to, and have an epitomic marriage like his parents, Sullivan expresses that feeling to be a “deep psychic wound that takes years to recover from.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sexual orientation and inequality Name Institution affiliation Sexual orientation and inequality Until recently same-sex marriage was illegal in the United States. People were arrested for being illegal for violating sodomy laws. The laws were finally outlawed in the year 2003 by the Texas court after a 6-3 was passed.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A big thing is that the couple gets their marital benefits. When a couple gets married they get many great benefits that a single person wouldn’t get, so a homosexual would say this was fair to them. Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. (1) People want to believe that they can love the people that they want to love, not the people that they legally have too.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Confusion in kids’ sexual identity can ruin their future and corrupt their worldview because of the lack of a traditional heterosexual family setting. If a homosexual couple wants to have children, they may choose to adopt. Studies show that kids growing up in that type of environment will only lead to a dysfunctional environment. Norman Wyers shows through recent studies in his article “Homosexuality In The Family: Lesbian And Gay Spouses” that many lesbians and gay men pursue heterosexual relationships and produce children. He claims that homosexuals marry for a variety of reasons: “lack of awareness of being homosexual, flight from homosexuality, a desire for family and children, or social pressures” (Wyers 143).…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In nineteen ninety-six, the Defense of Marriage Act was passed by Congress. This bill recognized only heterosexual marriages as a recognized union or marriage between two people. It also released states from same-sex marriages approved by other states (“Marriage Protection Amendment.”). Those in favor of allowing Defense of Marriage Act to stand, say that a marriage between a man and woman is one of the cornerstones of U.S. society, which traditionally of heterosexual marriages which many have viewed as a sacred union that is ordained by God. Another argument is that Gay marriages, cannot fulfill one of the fundamental purposes of marriage: which is procreation and raising children.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay Marriage Cons

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The test for truthfulness of the premise in reference to whether same-sex unions should be recognized passes because same-sex couples are not seeking religious recognition of their unions, therefore it would not destroy the institute of marriage that religious conservatives believe. All the premises made throughout the article present ideological reasoning on both sides; however, Bonauto’s arguments seem to be more based around equality and human rights and Crew’s are focused on his religious ideology. Bonauto seemed to present a stronger argument that pertains to the fundamental principals the nation was founded on in providing equal rights and protection under the law for all Americans. The argument is logically strong on both sides, but despite Crew using social science studies to make his argument that children are better off being raised by a mom and a dad, he does not provide further evidence illustrating the consequences of children being raised by same-sex couples.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why? Being gay is natural. Sure, moral fundamentalists may think it is a sin, but who are they to deny rights to those who are doing something that is just as right as a man loving a woman? Gays couples can be models of family life, offering just as much love and support for children as hetersexual couples. Gender should not be covered by marriage law, as the constitution protects US citizens from gender discrimination.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two individuals in a same-sex marriage are able to watch out for, and take care of each other in a way that society and the state does not have. Same-sex couples are able to take care of children and provide a safe and nurturing environment from them just as well as a heterosexual couples. In terms of the final purpose, the only contradiction would be lesbian couples however, Halwani states, “One might think they do because if lesbians marry other lesbians, this would result in leaving many men unsettled. This is not true, because even if lesbians do not marry other lesbians, they would not marry men anyway” (Halwani, 2010).…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Marriage has always been between a man and a woman, right? Well, then what happens when you suddenly change the definition and turn it into a “loving, romantic union between committed adults?” (Vogt). It doesn’t work like that. It confuses society and children.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays