• What Is An Alternative Hypothesis In A Courtroom Trial?

Improved Essays
Answer the following question:
Define the term statistical hypothesis. A hypothesis that is testable on the basis of a process being observed through a set of random variables.
Define the terms null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. The term null hypothesis refers to a general statement or a default position in which there is no relationship between two measured phenomena or no difference among groups.In other words, it is a simple hypothesis that is related to a contradiction to a theory that will be proved. While in an alternative hypothesis, there is a relationship between two measured phenomena or a hypothesis that is associated with a theory to be proved.
At which point in the process of statistical hypothesis testing do you choose
…show more content…
Describe a type 2 error
It is described as the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In your own words, describe statistical inference It is defined as a process of deducing properties of an underlying distribution by analysis of data.
Read the courtroom trial example provided on the wiki site. Then answer the following questions:
What is the null hypothesis in a courtroom trial? A null hypothesis in a courtroom trial is the one in which the defendant is not guilty.
What is the alternative hypothesis in a courtroom trial? An alternative hypothesis refers when the defendant is guilty.
At the beginning of a court trial, the defendant's lawyer either states that the defendant pleads guilty or not guilty. What step in statistical hypothesis testing does this relate to? It is the first step in statistical hypothesis where the lawyer states the null and alternative hypothesis i.e. whether the defendant pleads guilty or not guilty.
If the defendant is actually innocent, but found guilty, what type of error is this? This is a type one error.
If the defendant is actually guilty, but found innocent, what type of error is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Misaac Case Study

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    32) HOLDING a) The trial judge engaged in speculative reasoning while rejecting evidence which led to a conviction and denied the Apl. a fair trial, which justifies a retrial. b) Not answered. c) Not answered.(para.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The four research terms that are new to my understanding are response bias, descriptive analysis, quasi-experiment, and true experiment. • Response bias is the effect of nonresponse on a survey. How would results change if those who had not response would have responded. • Descriptive analysis is an analysis of all data for independent and dependent variables in the study. • Quasi-experiment has to do with participants.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is essential to a trials proceedings as witnesses are theoretically…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malice Liability Case

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Question 1: A: True. Malice aforethought is “a planned killing motivated by spite” (Woolman, Homicide). Additionally, there is express malice. Express malice is the “defendant’s subjective intent to kill”, or more specifically their feelings or opinions (ChartaCourse). Hatred or the emotional equivalent is a person’s feelings or opinions and goes directly to subjective intent to kill.…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fruit Flies Lab Report

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The fruit flies does deal with dominant vs. recessive for the wing traits. Complete dominance occurs when the dominant allele complete cover (hide) the recessive allele. This occurs to the wing traits in the fruit flies. Normal wings are dominant over vestigial wing and base on the data, the female that carries the vestigial wing did not create any F1 generation of vestigial traits. This occurs because the male has normal wing so when the two parent meet; the dominant normal wing in the male completely cover up the recessive vestigial wing in the female traits.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Secret Power of Jury Nullification Response In the Podcast “The Life of the Law, Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification”, Shannon Heffernan explains the often overlook power of jury nullification in the U.S. court system. She defines nullification as, when a jury is convinced that a defendant is guilty but find the defendant innocent anyway. Heffernan provides examples of cases throughout history that aid the idea that nullification among juries can potentially benefit courtroom justice. She also weights its negative effects that cause potentially major injustices in courtrooms.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    #7 –– What is bifurcated trial? Under what circumstances is it used? What are two significant cases relating to bifurcated trials? A bifurcated trial is a two-stage proceeding where the first stage includes a main trial that decides one’s guilt or innocence.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Illusory Causation in the Courtroom, published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, G. Daniel Lassiter explores illusory causation in terms of the role it plays in courtrooms. This is the possibility of the effect that camera perspective has on jurors’ judgements on the suspect’s guilt, whether it was a voluntary confession and sentence recommendations. The Death Penalty Information Center had documented cases in which death row inmates were released due to new evidence and in many cases, the cause of wrongful convictions can be traced back to the interrogation phase in which false confessions are extracted. Many experts believe that the solution to suspects being coerced into wrongful confessions are videotaping confessions.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A hypothesis is a educated guess of what scientist think the outcome of the experiment will be. Without data to support a hypothesis it has no value. In order to test a hypothesis you must have several different controlled observations called experiments to conduct a true scientific method. In order for scientist hypothesis to have value there must be more than one experiment in order to change and test one variable at a time. The variable that is planned to change is an independent variable and a variable that is planned to stay the same is a dependent…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The evidence against the defendant in trial must be convincing to the point that no reasonable person will doubt the defendant's guild. After reviewing and taking in consideration of all of the evidences brought against the defendant, there must be a logical reason to question the guilt of the defendant for it to be determined as reasonable…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evidence Based Hypothesis

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hypotheses are proposed explanations for a fairly narrow set of phenomena, they are usually based on prior experience, scientific background knowledge, preliminary observations and logic. We often come up with multiple hypotheses to explain an observation, we just eliminate the ones that are wrong. What's left over is not a theory or a law or an 'ultimate truth', it's just a possible explanation for something, one that can lead us to new hypothesis, which we may agree or disagree with the original one. A group of hypotheses comes together to form a conceptual framework. As sufficient data and evidence are gathered to support a hypothesis, it becomes a working hypothesis, which is a milestone on the way to becoming a theory.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the criminal justice system, murder is considered especially heinous (dun DUN). Murder is one of the few charges that carries capital punishment in our legal system. The United States Constitution puts the burden of coming to a verdict on a jury of twelve of your peers. A jury of your peers is not always fair because people often lack a knowledge to fully comprehend a trial, they are often selfish, and people can be indecisive. To embark upon the glorious journey of our legal system, we begin with the knowledge of the people on the jury.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society is remarkably quick to judge a situation without thoroughly investigating it. During the movie 12 Angry Men, the old saying that you cannot judge a book by its cover, truly comes to life. This movie shows and explains the process that the jury on each case go through. It shows how each juror goes through the process of determining whether the defendant is guilty or not. Throughout the duration of this paper, you will be provided definitions and examples of three ways that this movie relates to Communications 1010.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hypotheses are used in experiments to predict the outcome explaining why, how, or what will happen in an experiment. In order for hypotheses to be deemed correct, they must be supported by the experiment.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays