Sometimes a student needs a little extra to help them learn, but is the use of tablets really what they need? Some articles like “No Child Left Untableted,” lead readers to believe that some teachers are not for the use of tablets in the classroom. They argue that the tablets remove the cherished confidentiality that personal communication brings to the world of learning. On the other hand, articles like, “Improving Technological Literacy,” persuade readers to justify the use of technology in the classroom. Not unlike teachers, I wholeheartedly endorse that classroom technology does an insufficient job in teaching students, and should be steered away from if possible.
While it is true that technology is helpful, it does not necessarily follow that it is beneficial in the classroom. However, I caution teachers to use it often when trying to teach the children. The author of, “No Child Left Untableted,” Carlo Rotella asserts that, “I count on being able to read their faces and look them in the eye, and I would resist--O.K., freak out--if obliged to engage them through a screen in the classroom (Rotella par. 4). What Rotella really means is that there is no way for her to really tell if they need help …show more content…
Therefore, the opposition argues that in order to progress in this area, people need to begin learning at a young age. By doing this, the individual will not spend time learning how it works, but enhancing ways to develop. Another point that the adversaries bring up is that we need to embrace the new age. To embrace the new age, the author of, “Footsteps Of A New Millennium - - The Changing Face Of Knowledge,” Simon Hooper and Brad Hokanson suggest we grow with the times. In other words, their main point is that we need to adjust our lives to technological advances. By doing so, life will become easier. To put it bluntly, people believe by embracing technology, we will move
While it is true that technology is helpful, it does not necessarily follow that it is beneficial in the classroom. However, I caution teachers to use it often when trying to teach the children. The author of, “No Child Left Untableted,” Carlo Rotella asserts that, “I count on being able to read their faces and look them in the eye, and I would resist--O.K., freak out--if obliged to engage them through a screen in the classroom (Rotella par. 4). What Rotella really means is that there is no way for her to really tell if they need help …show more content…
Therefore, the opposition argues that in order to progress in this area, people need to begin learning at a young age. By doing this, the individual will not spend time learning how it works, but enhancing ways to develop. Another point that the adversaries bring up is that we need to embrace the new age. To embrace the new age, the author of, “Footsteps Of A New Millennium - - The Changing Face Of Knowledge,” Simon Hooper and Brad Hokanson suggest we grow with the times. In other words, their main point is that we need to adjust our lives to technological advances. By doing so, life will become easier. To put it bluntly, people believe by embracing technology, we will move