The first point is physical difference and there are so many physical differences between them. Dracula is more “normal” looking. Also, he isn’t considered creepy, so he is hot and powerful. Nosferatu is more a monster and is creepy and looks more like an animal and has fingernails like claws …show more content…
Dracula is more like a human he looks normal and can be around people (“Nosferatu vs. Dracula”, 2006). Nosferatu has jagged teeth that are similar to human teeth (“Nosferatu vs. Dracula, 2006). Dracula also has teeth that are similar but are kinda different. Overall they both qualities that are like human and if you compare it to a human it would be similar.
The last point is victim killing and they kill two different ways. The way Dracula kills is by sucking their blood until there is no more blood (“Who was the real Count Dracula”, 2008). This is similar to the ways the modern movies do it. Nosferatu kills his victims where he just attacks them and they die right away like if they are struck by a disease (“Nosferatu vs. Dracula”, 2006). These are the ways that they kill their victims and it will take longer for Dracula to kill his victims, but Nosferatu victims die so fast and they both have killed a lot in total in the movies.
Overall Dracula and Nosferatu are very different. Nosferatu is the one who is the monster. Dracula is the normal looking vampire. They both killed their victims in different ways and one dead faster than the other. After looking at the difference between them it wouldn’t be hard for anyone not to notice the difference between them.I gave you the points and now you know