Neo-Classism In Art Analysis

Improved Essays
During the French Revolution and Napoleonic era, there were apparent introductions of Roman culture into the artwork and the lifestyles of the French people. Many of these influences on the artwork depicted Roman political struggles and corresponded with current events of Napoleon's reign and the French Revolution, specifically matching Napoleon and King Luis’s government to Roman figures in both a good and bad ways. Three paintings by Jacques-Louis David; Oath of the Horatii, The Lictors Bringing to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons and Leonidas at Thermopylae are the starting points for the style of Neo-classism. Neo-classism in art can be identified as a time when Roman culture expressed through art widely shaped the culture of France during …show more content…
As a result, the patriotic consul had them put to death in order to maintain the government. In the painting Brutus is shown to be in a dark mood in the corner as the scene unfolds and his son’s bodies are brought into the room. Showing his sadness for what he had to do but at the same time him looking away from his son’s bodies reveals a recognition that he knows what he did was for the greater good of his country yet shows he is almost regretful. In Rome this was seen as the ultimate sacrifice for one’s country to defend the honor of your country even at the cost of you own …show more content…
In this painting Leonidas is shown to be sitting nonchalantly as what seems to be chaos is unfolding around him as his army prepares to face what is made out to be an unstoppable invading force from Persia. In the background you can see the Persian army approaching in their ships and in acknowledgment to what they are preparing to do the Greek phrase “Go, passer-by, to Sparta tell/Obedient to her law we fell” is carved onto a rock next to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In antiquity, a willingness to preserve patriotism or die for principle was paramount. These ideals opposed what was currently the state of France; self-centered aristocracy’s desire for luxury above the good of the state. Philosophers criticized societal blemishes during a time when there was unease with the monarchy and neoclassic artists incorporated political narrative messages through their artwork. David’s “The Oath of the Horatii” breaks from the Rococo by order of simplicity and moral conduct.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The inner disturbance the reader views is on one side Caesar is Brutus’s friend and he does not want him to die. The fondness he has for Caesar can be identified when the play states, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant I honor him.” () The reader can see the affection Brutus has for Caesar as he conveys the lines above at the funeral. On the other side Brutus considers Caesar is bad for rome and needs to be killed to save the democracy that his forefather created. This confusion can be seen in the play when it reads, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Hero Quotes

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brutus tried doing good, but still there is consequences. Brutus said to Lucilius, “ Thou hast described A hot friend cooling” (4.2. 18-19). They were saying when something begins to die, hence Rome, it needs to be brought back to life, or to a good note. That is what they’re trying to do here, keep Rome in order, not do evil. Though, with the Romans unhappy about the recent death of Caesar, Cassius says to Brutus,” If we do lose this battle, What are you determined to do?”…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    in his funeral speech. With saying this, he is asking the audience who doesn’t love their country enough to make it better. If they did not agree with what Brutus said, it would be believed that they do not truly care for Rome and what would be best for Rome and the people there. By using pathos, Brutus was able to pull on the audience’s emotions to make his speech be more…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All of this represents the “honorable” Brutus! Brutus was a political leader and also wanted the best for the Roman people and Rome. Due to this, he took part in Caesar's assassination which was stabbing him in the back because he was…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As can be seen through what Brutus Brutus, on countless occasions, allowed his future as a highly ranked official in Rome to be sacrificed for the greater good of the very city in which he wanted to lead. After Brutus killed Caesar and allowed Antony to speak Brutus gave up his social standings and became the most hated man in Rome, “We’ll burn the house of Brutus” (3.2.232). The citizens of Rome became so angered by Brutus’ actions that they were willing to go to…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Towards the end of the story Brutus decides to kill himself because he believes that “it is more worthy to leap in ourselves Than tarry till they push us.” (V.v.28-29) Brutus is honorable even in his death because he kills himself contrasting to Cassius’ death as he dies with his eyes closed when his slave stabs him. He was already close to dying because he was slowly losing his allies and the battle. Just before he dies, Brutus tells Caesar that he “...killed not thee with half so good a will.”…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens of Rome, do not lend me your ears, but instead lend me your heart. I stand before you on this tragic day to acknowledge the death of Marcus Brutus. Brutus, who was once the most respected, noble, and honorable man in all of Rome, now lies before us dead, more worthless than dust. Brutus was a stoic judge and the best friend of Julius Caesar, further demonstrating his high status and his nobility. His grievous death was caused by his dire desire for honor and his extraordinary view of idealism.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Character Study ——Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare, based on the story of the real-life Roman army general and state ruler. Caesar played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. From the plotting of the assassination to the aftermath that followed, two figures stand out to be most important --- Brutus and Marc Antony. By analyzing their attitude to Caesarand their speech to public, two people figures vividly demonstrated in front of the readers.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Is A Patriot Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus was a patriot and a savior for the people of Rome because he sacrificed his good friend to ensure that Romans would not be enslaved. His actions showed that the people of Rome and their safety come first; him maintaining a relationship with Julius Caesar was a priority for Brutus. Brutus knew that if he did not follow through with his plan, he would regret it for the rest of his life and Romans would die as slaves. Although some would say that Brutus was untrustworthy, by carrying out this attack, he showed how passionate he was about the citizens of Rome. While killing his best friend seemed like an awful thing to many people, Brutus’ decision was indeed correct.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wants Rome to be free of the man who is one of his best friends, but is ruining the place in which they live. These quotes and pieces of information about Brutus all give us an idea that Brutus did what he had to do for Rome even if that meant he had to kill his best…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any effective argument is guaranteed to have some form of rhetoric in order to push the persuasive agenda of the author. One such example of this is in Brutus’ speech after Julius Caesar’s death when he expressed his thoughts toward Caesar, but in doing so induced slight logical fallacies. However, he continued to effectively use rhetoric to persuade the people that Julius’ death was for the good of Rome. Brutus’ claim is that he killed Julius Caesar for the good of Rome.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Miguel de Cervantes, “Virtue is the truest nobility.” The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is about the conspiracy against the title character, Julius Caesar, the Roman general, and its effect towards the Romans. Brutus, an important figure of the Roman Republic, leads the conspiracy with Cassius. Brutus is important to the conspiracy as he served as a poster child of it. Every decision Brutus makes parallels his honor and integrity even if it means opposing the rest of the conspirators.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By this, Brutus means that once Caesar attained too much power and recognition, he forgot about those less fortunate than him and began to view himself as a god rather than a servant to his people. Because of this, despite his reservations, Brutus comes to the conclusion that Caesar’s coronation would be disastrous to Rome and that he must be stopped. Since Caesar 's rise to power seemed inevitable at that point, the only way to avoid it was through his death. This motive shows that the conspirators sought to sacrifice Caesar in the name of Rome’s well-being, rather than brutally butcher him in an act of…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays