Medical Confidentiality

Improved Essays
Today, many people know and are aware that they are allowed to donate their organs to science after they are deceased. For those who do not know, donating organs help people who are in need of a new organ or tissues. Recently, it has been discussed that perhaps organs are not the only thing that someone can donate. It has been asked if we could donate our medical data after we die. “Why? Because medical research cannot take place without medical data, and the sad fact is that most people’s medical data are inaccessible for research once they are dead” (Shaw, Gross, and Erren 2017). There are the data rights to consider, the rights being the medical confidentiality where medical records are not to be shared or researched unless the patient consents …show more content…
While there are debatable areas in this idea, everyone may agree that it is best to prevent future causes of death one may experience and with this data a researcher could study more into it. Shaw, Gross, and Erren give many biased comments in their article. “Wouldn’t it be a lot easier if people could sing up to be data donors the same way that they can register as organ donors? That way, consent would exist for researchers to use data posthumously” (Shaw, Gross, and Erren 2017). The authors are clearly agreeing with the side of “donating” medical data after death. Though it sounds like a good idea, most people may not see it the same as these three do for some do not understand how much this could help out for future …show more content…
The long-term impact of this could help scientists discover cures and help solve unknown causes of diseases. While this may not appeal to many or affect anybody at the moment, it may be something to further look into and maybe consider that this idea could work. In the meantime, medical records of the deceased remain a secret in some countries while others may be able to look at them with the patients consent before

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In 1976, the California Supreme Court ruled in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California that a patient’s right to confidentiality “ends where the public peril begins.” It was decided that doctor-patient confidentiality could—and should—be broken if the doctor believes a patient will cause serious harm to another person. In his article entitled “A Defense of Unqualified Medical Confidentiality,” Kenneth Kipnis argues that doctor-patient confidentiality should always be kept, contrary to the findings of the Tarasoff case. He presents the fictionalized case of the infected spouse to clarify his argument. In this case, a husband learns from his doctor that he is HIV positive.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Sal Iva, a PhD candidate, wants to study electrolytes in the saliva of patients with cystic fibrosis. Dr Rosenstein, Director of the CF clinic, offers to collect 1 cc of saliva from 10 patients at their next clinic visit. Sal does not want or need any identifying information. Is Sal exempt from IRB oversight?…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a loved one dies, there are many things that can be done with the body. There is the choice of embalmment for a funeral, cremation, organ donation, or donating the body to science. It is apparent what happens when the body is embalmed, cremated, or the organs are donated to save a life, but there are endless possibilities for what happens to a body donated to science. So, what exactly happens when someone’s body is used to further scientific research? This question is exactly what Mary Roach answers.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example yes, it is a nice thing to donate your organs to a person when you no longer need them anymore, but it is still disrupting the dead. One of the quotes that go back to the story line is “Two hours pass, and the surgeons make progress. Despite the procurement team’s best efforts, however, most of the organs had already been lost (128)”. This puts into perspective that when it is thought about not all the organs is actually used after the person is dissected. Which brings up the point… is it really worth giving up your body and not having a peaceful after life if there is a chance of the organs not working in the next…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fetal Consent Case Study

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Consentimiento There have been several situations in history including what belongs to whom. There are more laws on possession than most people would be willing to count. Consent should be given as an official count of giving something significant over to another person, whether it be a car, house, or even organ donations. Not only is it illegal to take these things, it is incredibly immoral to do with or without a law. Before laws were implemented, doctors could take from their patients as they pleased.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ryan T. Anderson's article titled “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” begins with Anderson setting the stage of the idea of Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) being introduced with stories of patients diagnosed with terrible diseases. Anderson describes the act of eighteen states considering legalizing PAS a “grave mistake”, and describes a more merciful alternative of doctors giving patients the means to ease their pain as they await their demise. Anderson also quotes Victoria Reggie Kennedy, who believes that most people would prefer a death surrounded by loved ones, and a PAS would be cold, unloving and extreme. Anderson also claims that this would be contrary to the Hippocratic Oath and that nobody should be legally allowed to kill…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the shortage of organs available for donation, the criteria to consider a body for donation has changed from “brain death” to “circulatory death”, making organs available sooner. This change in practice has caused ethical dilemmas among the healthcare environment. In a “2006 study found that some perioperative nurses did not accept the irreversibility of cardiac death” (37). A nurse is trained to save lives, and this practice goes against that notion. A nurse must set aside her own personal views and help the family exercise their right to the choices that they…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moore was accused of trying to make a quick buck off the scientists who saved his life by removing his cancerous spleen, his plea for three billion dollars was denied having made it all the way to the supreme court. As a result of these cases having come from times in history without adequate legislation on tissue donation by which to comprehend the processes and limitations of tissue donation and property rights, Lacks and Moore both ended up in less than perfect standing. Lacks died poor, her cells living on to be a part of amazing discoveries and Moore was unable to get the compensation he felt he deserved for being a part of investigative research through his tissue donation as part of his treatment as a patient at UCLA. Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin—Madison, Alta Charo, goes over the history of legislation and lack of history- surrounding the donation of medical tissue in the piece entitled "Body of Research - Ownership, and Use of Human Tissue" stating;…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is taken away from the possibility of saving people’s lives. Some people do not even know what actually happens to organs when a person dies. Even after doing research it still can be very confusing on whether organs are needed after death.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The one of important principle in medical ethics that the information about patient is private and secrecy that relating to that information. Patient confidentiality is a primary part of health care that should be caravel about it . It requires for all health care providers to keep the personal health information about the patient’s private unless the consent release to the information is provided by the patient. The ethics issues surround in patient confidentiality is the one of the important topic that can affected the patient social life if one know the patient and the condition my he inform the rest of the society about patient condition that my make them Socially pariah .I chose this topic because it's the most sensitive…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, I shared with you the multitude of uses for these bodies including not only medicine, but also vehicular testing. So after all of this I just want to leave you all with a question; would you consider donating your body to science? References Bergeron, L. (2005, September 14). Rite of passage for first-year medical school students:…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    . Reference list Allen, A. 2009. Privacy and medicine [Online]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/privacy-medicine/ [Accessed 04 November 2010].…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It may be a sign of respect to leave their organs, but without organ donations, many people wouldn’t be where they are right now. Many people need a cure to certain organ diseases, and a deceased organ donor could be their only chance of survival. Organ Donation Persuasive Essay Gavin Sauter Third, whether or not the person should donate their organs shouldn’t be up to their families, let alone other people. They should be the ones to decide whether or not they want to donate…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Right to Die” is this a choice or is this a choice that society should be allowed to make? The controversy over someone choosing to end their life when dealing with a terminal illness with a physician’s help is the rights of the patient and not the right of society to choose. People who are dealing with terminal illness should have a choice to die or not with their doctor’s help. In a physician-assistant suicide the doctor prescribes the medication that will end a patient’s life, but the patient has to be able to take the medication which will result in death.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays