McCloskey makes three separate arguments in his article, “On Being an Atheist”, these three arguments are, Cosmological, Theological, and Moral arguments. The Cosmological is about the claim for the existence of God, the Theological would be considered the intelligent case, and finally, the moral case is about being morally perfect. If you combine all three of these arguments they make up the Cumulative case, which is to be consider the argument of personal, moral, and intelligent creator of the universe. If you were to take the three arguments and argue them separating, they would not do much. However if you combine all the arguments, then it makes a pretty strong argument in the favor of God does
McCloskey makes three separate arguments in his article, “On Being an Atheist”, these three arguments are, Cosmological, Theological, and Moral arguments. The Cosmological is about the claim for the existence of God, the Theological would be considered the intelligent case, and finally, the moral case is about being morally perfect. If you combine all three of these arguments they make up the Cumulative case, which is to be consider the argument of personal, moral, and intelligent creator of the universe. If you were to take the three arguments and argue them separating, they would not do much. However if you combine all the arguments, then it makes a pretty strong argument in the favor of God does