Landing On The Moon

Improved Essays
The first human landing on the moon in 1969 was a great accomplishment for America and a huge disappointment for the USSR. But, what if it never happened what if the USA faked the whole thing? Just to win the Space Race? Would America really reside to being that naive just to win a race to the moon? Maybe, if they did they would have to do really good job of hiding the evidence showing that is was just filmed. Just a few things were slipped through the editor's’ eyes.

For example, a big mistake made by the people filming the moon landings was that they used the same background for a two different photos on two different Apollo missions! It is very unlikely that the moon will have very, very similar land formations. The people who made these
…show more content…
Wouldn't there be a crater underneath the module sense the impact on the moon was still really sufficient? NASA says that since there are lower levels of gravity the amount of power needed to land would be much less, but wouldn’t the fine dust, that was famous for allowing the first step to be so clear, have been disrupted and floating around the air? That’s what leads us to believe the module was placed there on the set and did not fly to the moon from Earth.

These facts make the moon landing look pretty suspicious, and these are not all the facts people have to offer! There are many more and some that might be better than these. One last one is the fact that The moon is constantly being bombarded with micrometeorites that travel at speeds of 20,000 mph. A bullet from a rifle travels up to 800 mph. So wouldn’t NASA be concerned for the astronauts about possibly being hit by these? Too many questions for scientists and
NASA to answer, so was it faked, produced by a film crew, edited by editors and not thoroughly looked at by all the people involved? You either believe the 40,000 people involved or you

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Apollo 11 Assassination

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the biggest rumors is that it is totally fake because in one of the pictures, there is no stars in the sky. There are so many rumors that they can’t explain all of them. But then again, Apollo 11 was the first moon landing. So thanks to Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Edwin Aldrin.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who do not believe may want to reconsider their view towards this issue. This paper, will present evidence supporting the statement of why I believe that the moon landings did occur and try to discredit any fake information presented in the…

    • 1977 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever thought about the different conspiracy theories? Something that exposed the myths of science denial? Well if you have, this book has conspiracy theories and just enough evidence to make you believe it! Darryl Cunningham’s book “How to Fake a Moon Landing” is a graphic novel that entices you with several different scientific facts and tries to cast a shadow of doubt.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why there were also no stars shown in the photos is because they were too bright for the camera to capture them. There was a ¨fast exposure time¨ and ¨small aperture¨ (www.theguardian.com). Therefore, there was no way to capture the background of the moon with the stars because they were too bright. To recreate this, they would have had to use millions of light lasers, which at that time were expensive and only came in the color red. Overall, the moon landing was real because uneven surfaces influenced the shadows and the brightness of the stars also affected…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the febrile child’s fever reached 104ºF, he was immediately rushed to the hospital. Many gainsay the idea that the United States really did land on the moon in 1969, despite the prevalent proof surrounding the matter. The dark rain clouds and thunder in the distance warned of the imminent rainstorm.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moon Conspiracy

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Within the documentary The Truth Behind The Moon Landings, theorists claim the whole landing to have been staged with props because of the lack of technology, the multiple light sources, and lack of stars in all photo and video evidence. Many people are skeptical about the Apollo 11 landing on the moon because, in the 1960s, NASA did not have advanced enough equipment and technology. Ralph René, a self-taught engineer and author claims, “there’s absolutely no way they went to the moon with what they had, in fact, there’s no way they can go today, there’s no way they can go tomorrow. You don’t send man where you haven't sent the monkey.”…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So to fix this conspiracists claim that NASA had a studio where they filmed the moon missions, surrounded, with a giant black screen, or they altered the pictures and removed the stars. However, there is a logical explanation as to why there are no stars. The moon is made out of regolith that is about four-to-five kilometers deep. The regolith has an albedo rating, telling how much light is reflected, between seven and ten percent (“Theories”). The reason people can see the moon is not because the moon glows on its own, but because the moon is reflecting seven to ten percent of the light from the sun.…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Area 51 Conspiracy

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (Dummy Drops and UFOs) It has been said that in 1976, the moon landing was all a hoax made in a studio that was broadcasted across the world. There have been reports that state that the first few minutes of the moon landing were not broadcasted because of what the astronauts had…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apollo 11 Research Paper

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Apollo 11 mission is credited for not only landing a man on the moon, but also for collecting the first samples from another planetary body (SNASM). Through the research, many theories were proven to either be true or false. Prior to the moon landing, scientists had many questions concerning the moon’s surface and even the possibility of life on the moon. Before the moon landing , the idea of life on the moon was widely accepted. Apollo 11, however proved that idea wrong.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People examined the video, and came to the conclusion it didn’t correlate with their understanding of space. What escaped the minds of the delusional is that although they discredit it, the Russians never did. While certain things in the video didn’t correlate with their understanding of space, space represents the unknown. Because the astronaut was opaque, doesn’t mean he was a ghost or in reality he was. What we’re employing is technology that functions according to our physics on earth, not one based on the moons.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NASA Destroying The Moon

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In June of 2009, NASA launched a spacecraft to the moon that was unmanned. The spacecrafts are supposed to reveal if there is ice or water underneath the surface of the moon. It would be revealed by the twin impacts of the Lunar Crater Observation and its Sensing Satellite. To collect this information, the crafts are supposed to crash into the moon at a speed of 6,000 mph. Nasa expects "plumes of moon dust — perhaps full of ice — (to soar) 6.2 miles high above the moon's Cabeus crater."…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The area I am talking about is that we brought pieces of the moon back with us, rocks that would be nearly impossible to replicate here on earth and would actually be easier to gather by traveling to the moon and bringing them back with us. These rocks are laden with tiny holes from meteoroid impacts that are only possible on a planet with little to no atmosphere. Also, if examined, one would find isotopes that are the result of reactions with highly charged particles that could, again, only happen on a planet with little to no atmosphere. Another piece of evidence that implies a moon landing is the size of the team; at its peak, the size of the team that landed man on the moon was over 300,000. You would think after 45 years someone would have come forward with the supposed…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The one reason that the waving flag, when you look at the photo of Neil on the moon, the flag does know that it 's moving and that is a little odd since there is no atmosphere out there, that is a huge head scratcher just because if they were really on the moon why is it moving. Another reason why I agree with it being a conspiracy is because the claim has it that if they landed on the moon that the crater would be so much deeper and larger than it really is. In the photo, it is not really even visible or ever look like it was moved. Of the 10 reasons that I saw, reading into them really makes me think that maybe the moon landing never really happened. The claims that are being said really make sense, especially if you look at the photos being shown; you see exactly what thousands of others see.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moon And Beyond

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Moon and Beyond, America’s pursuit of new frontiers The moon and stars have pondered men for thousands of years, but all it took were three American astronauts to captivate every person not just in America, but also throughout the world in July of 1969. But how did America get that far and what did Americans think of NASA and the government in its attempt to send a man beyond our home on planet Earth. Man had never ventured out into our solar system up until the Apollo program took flight in the late 1960’s and most would argue that this would not have been possible without John F. Kennedy and his bold statement in 1962 stating that “We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard…”…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 12, 1962, president john F Kennedy delivered his “why we chose to go to the moon” speech at Rice University in Houston, Texas. The occasion of the speech was to address to the American people the importance of returning to space and being the first nation to place a man on the surface of the moon. Kennedy chose this time to deliver his speech because we were currently at the height of the cold war and the United States was beginning to lose the space and technological race against the Russian nation. Therefore Kennedy appeared at Rice University where he delivered his speech to a crowd that consisted of scientists, professors, students, and the general American people. The context that shaped Kennedys’ speech was the importance of mankind to achieve the near impossible feat of landing a human being on the surface of the moon and the profound impact that this accomplishment would have on the future of the human race.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays