Capital Punishment In Baze V. Rees, Kentucky

Improved Essays
The death penalty is a serious matter all over the world. People all around world have been sent to their death of their crime they committed. People that been sent to court that have good lawyers and won the case did not been sent to death road, but people without a good lawyer have been sent to death row. Also it could be the color of the skin that nowadays people are having trouble with.
Capital punishment in America has less to do with whether those convicted of violent crime deserve to die than with whether state and federal governments deserve to kill those whom it has imprisoned. Death sentences are imposed in a criminal justice system that treats you better if you are rich and guilty than if you are poor and innocent. Also if the crime the person committed was vicious crime,they should be sent to death. Because if a dangerous person did something to a innocent person and hurt them in any way, the innocent person would be living the pain its whole life and could be thinking of suicide because of the pain they go through.
…show more content…
In Baze v. Rees,Kentucky has adopted a method of execution believed to be the most humane available, one it shares with 35 other States... Kentucky's decision to adhere to its protocol...cannot be viewed as probative of the wanton infliction of pain under the Eighth Amendment. Family members who have lost loved ones, the hurt, pain and all the family went through when there love dies feel that the death penalty will not heal their wounds. The long process of extended legal prior to the executions can prolong the agony experienced by the victims'

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For example, Jeffrey Dahmer was a notorious serial killer and known cannibal who raped, murdered, and dismembered his victims. Instead of facing retributive punishment for his crimes, he was sentenced to multiple life terms and was later killed by an inmate. A person who has taken the life of another purposely and premeditated deserves to face the punishment of death under law. Executing a criminal who murdered another human being offers a way of retribution to the loved ones of the victim because even though they cannot change what has happened or have their loved one back, by seeing justice be served it assures to them that there will be no other victims and families who face the same tragedy, giving them some closure.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The implementation of the death penalty is a tricky and controversial subject. When writing for the New Republic in 1985, Edward I. Koch and David Bruck shared their judgement on capital punishment. They addressed the topic from two opposing viewpoints and challenged the death penalty’s effectiveness and place in American society today. Edward I. Koch served as mayor of the state of New York for eleven years and was involved in public service for a total of twenty years. In his essay titled, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” Koch was adamant that the death penalty affirmed the highest value for human life by being the highest penalty (Koch 486).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has no consistency, and it seems like a random pick of who get executed or not. In a country where we value equality and our rights, this system is not fair. There are several factors that affect how likely a criminal is to be put on Death Row. For example, Hull talks about the “Vagaries of…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a criminal is sentenced to life in prison, at least their family can still visit them if they want to. Also, if criminals just received life in prison, their case could be reviewed and they might be proven innocent during that time. Life in prison could also benefit the people. If the criminal was sentenced to death, we would be giving in to the criminal and making it so he/she doesn't have to do the same thing in prison over and over every day for the rest of their life and face monotony.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If every form of death penalty is at risk of “extreme pain or torture” then no one should have to do die by being executed. Sentencing someone to death denies them the right to life – enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Right(Amnesty). The traditional method of death by hanging was also easily bungled: If the drop was too short, there would be a slow and agonizing death by strangulation; if the drop was too long, the individual’s head would be torn off (Aclu). Absolutely no one should have to die by having their head torn off or by strangulation, and if the death penalty has risks that big then nobody should have to be a victim of this cruel…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mcadams Death Penalty

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty gives families closure by making them feel safe again. The victim no longer has to worry about the criminal invading their life or their family's life anymore and making them constantly feel worried. If someone kills another human being, they have “taken the life of another, have forfeited their own right to live.” In more serious crimes, the person who commits the crime is usually sent to jail. The victim's family feels traumatized knowing that the perpetrator is still alive and still a danger to society.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In addition, life sentence fulfills the same two purposes capital punishment was aimed to do. Capital punishment is aimed at isolating malefactors from society by killing while life sentence has a more humane answer by literally isolating them in prisons. Also, capital punishment is aimed at deterring crime which life sentence does better than capital punishment as we can conclude from statistics and polls. Last but not least, life sentence saves…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Very few countries similar to the United States employ the death penalty as punishment for murder. The list of other countries that also apply the death penalty includes China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Needless to say, we are not keeping good company when it comes to the practice. Support for the death penalty became popular during the 1990’s, when crime was on the rise and politicians, in an effort to appear tough on crime, embraced policies such as the three-strike rule and minimum sentencing. Since that time, however, the political climate has changed, and the death penalty has frequently come under fire from both liberals and conservatives alike.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years everything has change including the laws. The Supreme Court decisions on the death penalty from the premodern were one of the hardest decisions many individuals face, either because of their gender, race, or class. The consequences that each individual face is based on each act they make. It has become a controversy throughout the years because many people is against the death penalty while others are in favor.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American serial killer and rapist, Ted Bundy, was one of the most notorious criminals of the late 20th century. Bundy raped and murdered young women in several states. He was connected to at least 36 murders, but some thought he had committed one hundred or more (Bio). How could a person want this guy living, out on the streets, or knowing that his evil brain is alive thinking of what he wants to do next? Ted Bundy eventually got the death penalty and he more than ever deserved that.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Guilty Wrong

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Guilty Until Proven Innocent - The Death Penalty In 2005, the supreme court struck down the death penalty for juveniles. The United States was one of the last countries that still allowed capital punishment for offenders under 18 years of age, along with Saudi Arabia,Sudan,Iran,and Yemen, and it only took them 105 years and 26 teenage and child lives. Capital punishment in the united states has been in place since the burning of Captain George Kendall for being a spy. Since then, 1,392 american lives have been executed for their crimes, and now, there are currently 3,035 people are living their lives on the fearful death row, and since 62% of Americans support capital punishment, it seems that the Death Penalty isn’t going anywhere soon, but…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electric Chair Pros And Cons

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Officials in California delayed the execution of 46-year-old Michael Morales, sentenced to death for a 1981 murder. His lawyers argued that a lethal injection would constitute cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited under the US constitution” (Hooper). But, that is not true, the Supreme Court along with the people who give and handle the ways the death penalty is given have stated that, yes, sometimes the death penalty and the way it 's done will cause some pain. They also state that the death penalty is not unconstitutional just by the fact of how much pain is given along with the penalty. As stated earlier the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is humane and that cruel and unusual punishment is only when excessive torture is given.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays