After successfully catching a large dorado fish, Pi discovers that he acts similarly to Richard Parker as he eats it: “It came as an unmistakable indication to me of how low I had sunk the day I noticed...that I ate like an animal, that with this noisy, frantic, unchewing wolfing-down of mine was exactly the way Richard Parker ate” (284). Pi clearly exhibits animalistic behavior comparable to that of Richard Parker, implying a loss of humanity. Pressured by the impending threat of starvation, Pi forfeits respectable manners and ravenously shreds food like a large carnivorous predator. He notices this, saying, “I descended to a level of savagery I never thought possible” (197). In addition to acting exactly like Richard Parker, Pi’s gradual improvement in hunting skill and knowledge also contributes to his animal-like demeanor. Pi exhibits this accumulative increase in hunting knowledge when he learns how to hunt sharks. “...I went for smaller sharks...and I killed them myself. I found that stabbing them through the eyes with a knife was a faster, less tiresome way of killing them than hacking at the tops of their heads with the hatchet” (279). Pi’s skill development in shark hunting is clear in the passage. By learning how to use less energy and be more efficient in obtaining food, Pi …show more content…
Yann Martel’s Life of Pi clearly portrays this concept in the tumultuous story of Pi Patel who survives a trip across the Pacific in a lifeboat accompanied by an adult tiger. By giving up religious rules and societal norms, devolving to an animal-like state, and developing a more confident disposition, Pi’s behavioral modifications explicitly illustrate how much human beings will conform their behavior to