Thus, according to Keohane, international regimes do not hold any supreme power over nations. They are based on cooperation and only operate if nations submit and promote the rules. It is unlikely, in theory, that a nation would fall under an international regime if they were not supporters of its policies. This is unless a weaker nation were pressured, which seems plausible, but perhaps I am misunderstanding the context. The United Nations is an example of an international regime, which has been relatively successful, but still comes into conflict with nations not following set regulations, such as North Korea in the present time. While North Korea was admitted to the United Nations, this nation follows very few of the proposed rules and
Thus, according to Keohane, international regimes do not hold any supreme power over nations. They are based on cooperation and only operate if nations submit and promote the rules. It is unlikely, in theory, that a nation would fall under an international regime if they were not supporters of its policies. This is unless a weaker nation were pressured, which seems plausible, but perhaps I am misunderstanding the context. The United Nations is an example of an international regime, which has been relatively successful, but still comes into conflict with nations not following set regulations, such as North Korea in the present time. While North Korea was admitted to the United Nations, this nation follows very few of the proposed rules and